[2017] KEELC 812 (KLR)
The court found that the Plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence of membership in the Muka Mukuu Farmers Co-operative Society or of lawful allocation of the disputed plot. The only evidence produced by the Plaintiff were two letters from the Society, which were insufficient to establish ownership or...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 812 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Andrew Manguu Kaboi; Defendant: Wellington Kihato
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 35 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Injunction Application / Ruling on Application for Temporary Injunction Pending Hearing and Determination of Main Suit
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Judges
- OA Angote
- Legal Topics
- Ownership Disputes, Cooperative Society Land, Temporary Injunctions, Prima Facie Case, Land Allocation, Possession and Occupation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew Manguu Kaboi
Plaintiff
Wellington Kihato
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Injunction Application / Ruling on Application for Temporary Injunction Pending Hearing and Determination of Main Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiff has established a prima facie case with a probability of success to warrant the grant of a temporary injunction.
- 2 Whether the Plaintiff has demonstrated sufficient evidence of ownership or allocation of the disputed land.
- 3 Whether the balance of convenience favours the grant or refusal of the injunction.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence of membership in the Muka Mukuu Farmers Co-operative Society or of lawful allocation of the disputed plot. The only evidence produced by the Plaintiff were two letters from the Society, which were insufficient to establish ownership or allocation. In contrast, the Defendant produced receipts, a membership card, and a transfer agreement demonstrating his membership and acquisition of the land. The Defendant had also developed and occupied the land. The court held that the Plaintiff had not established a prima facie case with a probability of success and that the balance of convenience favoured the Defendant, who stood...
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The Plaintiff's application dated 26th May, 2016 is dismissed with costs to the Defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MACHAKOS
ELC. CASE NO. 35 OF 2016
ANDREW MANGUU KABOI .......................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
WELLINGTON KIHATO ..........................................DEFENDANT
RULING
1. What is before me is the Application by the Plaintiff dated 26th May, 2016 seeking for the following orders:
a. That upon granting prayer (2) hereinabove and/or pending the hearing and determination of the main suit herein the Honourable Court be pleased to grant orders of temporary injunction to issue to the Respondent whether by himself, his agents, servants, employees, workers, and/or otherwise whosoever from unlawfully entering and/or encroaching into and trespassing thereon and interfering, damaging, demolishing, wasting, constructing on, alienating or otherwise dealing with Plaintiff’s parcel of land known as Plot Number Mithini C 16 located at Muka Mukuu Farmers Co-operative Society Limited.
b. That this Honourable Court be pleased to issue orders to the effect that the Police Officer commanding Kangundo Police Station be ordered to enforce compliance of the orders sought.
c. That the Honourable Court be pleased to make such other and/or further orders that it may deem fit and expedient in the interest of justice to grant.
d. That whole of the costs of this Application be borne by the Respondent.
2. The Application is supported by the Affidavit of the Plaintiff who has deponed that he is the proprietor of land known as plot number Mithini C 61 located at Muka Mukuu Farmers-Co-operative Society Limited.
3. It is the Plaintiff’s deposition that on 10th August, 2015, the Defendant encroached on his land and that he lodged a complaint with the Management Committee of the Society who confirmed in writing that the land is his.
4. In his response, the Defendant deponed that he is a member of Muka Mukuu Farmer’s Co-operative Society Ltd (the Society); that he bought the suit land from Julius Nyerere Sila who is member number 1701 and that he conducted a search before purchasing the said land.
5. According to the Defendant, the suit land was initially registered in the name of Paul Nthekethe who sold it to Julius Nyerere Sila who paid Kshs. 20,000 to the Society.
6. It is the Defendant’s case that he has been on the suit land since he bought it and has dug a well, build a house for his farmhand, erected a chain link fence, planted trees, bananas and conducted commercial cultivation on the land.
7. The Respondent filed submissions and authorities which I have considered.
8. The Plaintiff’s case is that he owns land known as Mithini C 16 located at Muka Mukuu Farmers Co-operative Society Limited. The Plaintiff has annexed on his Affidavit two letters dated 22nd October, 2015 and 24th March, 2016 by the Society respectively.
9. In the letter of 22nd October, 2015, the Society stated that Plot No. Mithini 16B belongs to Andrew Manguu Kaboi under share number 397.
10. In the letter of 24th March, 2016, the Society informed Julius Nyerere Sila to vacate Plot No. Mithini C 16 for Andrew Manguu Kaboi.
11. In the same letter, Julius Nyerere was informed that according to the records of the Society, Raphael Kamba Kathumbi was allocated Plot No. Mithini C 16 on 19th August, 1996 and transferred the same to Andrew Manguu Kaboi on 17th November, 2017.
12. Other than those two letters, the Plaintiff did not produce copies of the members of the Society to show that the said Julius Nyerere or the Plaintiff was ever a member of the Society.
13. On the other hand, the Defendant produced in evidence the copy of the receipt dated 24th September, 2015 showing that he had paid to the Society the transfer fee.
14. The Defendant has also exhibited a copy of membership card which shows that he was allowed to be part of the membership of the Society and was awarded certificate number 445. The certificate of Paul Nthekethe was also exhibited together with the fees that were paid by the Plaintiff.
15. The Defendant has further exhibited the Agreement dated 24th July, 2015 in which Julius Nyerere entered into with him.
16. The Defendant has developed the suit land by putting up a chain link fence and a permanent house. The Plaintiff is not in occupation of the land.
17. Considering that the Defendant has exhibited receipts showing that he is a paid up member of the Society after purchasing the shares of Mr. Nyerere who was member of the Society, and in view of the developments that the Defendant has made, it is the Defendant who will suffer loss if the injunctive order is issued.
18. The Plaintiff has not shown by way of evidence that he is a member of the Society. There is no evidence to show how the Plaintiff was allocated the said land, if at all. Consequently, I find and hold that the Plaintiff has not established a prima facie case with chances of success.
19. For those reasons, I dismiss the Application dated 26th May, 2016 with costs.
DATED, DELIVERED AND SIGNED IN MACHAKOS THIS 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2017.
O. A. ANGOTE
JUDGE