[2007] KEHC 3614 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 3614 (KLR)

The court found that the preliminary objection raised by the defendants was not properly before the court as it was based on matters of fact rather than pure points of law. The issue of substitution of the deceased 1st defendant had been overtaken by events since the plaintiffs had already withdrawn the suit against...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KEHC 3614 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Andrew Munyinyi; Plaintiff: Edward Njenga; Plaintiff: Allan Mbugua; Defendant: Kinuthia Munyinyi Igogo; Defendant: Kiberi Munyinyi Igogo
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 108 of 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
preliminary objection dismissed
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Res Judicata, Substitution of Parties
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Adverse Possession Res Judicata Substitution of Parties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew Munyinyi

Plaintiff

Edward Njenga

Plaintiff

Allan Mbugua

Plaintiff

Kinuthia Munyinyi Igogo

Defendant

Kiberi Munyinyi Igogo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the suit is res judicata and should be dismissed on that ground.
  2. 2 Whether the suit against the 1st defendant should proceed given the 1st defendant is deceased and no legal representative has been substituted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the preliminary objection raised by the defendants was not properly before the court as it was based on matters of fact rather than pure points of law. The issue of substitution of the deceased 1st defendant had been overtaken by events since the plaintiffs had already withdrawn the suit against the 1st defendant. The objection on res judicata was not properly raised by way of a formal application supported by affidavit evidence, and therefore could not be determined at this stage. Consequently, the preliminary objection was dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs, and the parties were directed to proceed to the main suit.

Court Disposition

preliminary objection dismissed

Orders

  • The preliminary objection dated 28 October 2004 is dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs.
  • Parties to proceed to the main suit.