[2015] KEELRC 406 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 406 (KLR)

The court found that the Claimant's affidavit filed on 23rd July 2015 was irregular because it sought to respond to the Preliminary Objection by adducing facts, rather than confining itself to the pleadings. The court agreed with the Respondent that the proper procedure required the Claimant to restrict his response...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELRC 406 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Andrew Musila Nzai; Respondent: Memon Education Board
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 369 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Interlocutory Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Affidavit
Outcome
Interlocutory orders granted; Claimant's affidavit struck out; directions for written submissions on Preliminary Objection.
Legal Topics
Preliminary Objection, Affidavit Striking Out, Written Submissions, Pleadings, Service of Process
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Preliminary Objection Affidavit Striking Out Written Submissions Pleadings Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew Musila Nzai

Claimant

Memon Education Board

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Interlocutory Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Affidavit

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant's affidavit filed on 23rd July 2015 is properly before the court.
  2. 2 Whether the Preliminary Objection should be disposed of by way of written submissions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Claimant's affidavit filed on 23rd July 2015 was irregular because it sought to respond to the Preliminary Objection by adducing facts, rather than confining itself to the pleadings. The court agreed with the Respondent that the proper procedure required the Claimant to restrict his response to his pleadings. As the Claimant was absent and had been duly served with both the Application and Hearing Notice, the Application was unchallenged. Consequently, the court struck out the Claimant's affidavit and directed that the Preliminary Objection be disposed of by way of written submissions, setting timelines for both parties to file and serve their submissions.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory orders granted; Claimant's affidavit struck out; directions for written submissions on Preliminary Objection.

Orders

  • The affidavit filed by the Claimant on 23rd July 2015 is struck out.
  • The Preliminary Objection shall be disposed of by way of written submissions.