[2019] KEHC 10368 (KLR)
The court determined that the dispute arose from an employer-employee relationship and therefore falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court as established by Article 162(2) of the Constitution and the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act. Consequently, the High Court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 10368 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Andrew Shisala Angalushi; Respondent: West Kenya Sugar Company Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 47 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- matter transferred for want of jurisdiction
- Judges
- DN Musyoka, CM Njagi
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of High Court, Employment Relationship, Transfer of Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew Shisala Angalushi
Appellant
West Kenya Sugar Company Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the High Court have jurisdiction to hear an appeal arising from an employer-employee dispute?
- 2 Should the matter be transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court?
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that the dispute arose from an employer-employee relationship and therefore falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court as established by Article 162(2) of the Constitution and the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act. Consequently, the High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the appeal, and the proper course is to transfer the matter to the Employment and Labour Relations Court for further directions.
Court Disposition
matter transferred for want of jurisdiction
Orders
- The appeal is transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court sitting at Kisumu for further directions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA
CIVIL APPEAL NO 47 OF 2018
ANDREW SHISALA ANGALUSHI………………………….APPELLANT
VERSUS
WEST KENYA SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED……..........RESPONDENT
(An appeal arising from the judgment and decree of the Hon. Evans W Muleka, Senior Resident Magistrate, in Butali SRMCCC No. 177 of 2017 of 8th March 2018)
RULING
1. The Constitution 2010, at Article 162(2), establishes a special court to handle disputes that revolve around industrial and labour relations. Article 165(5) of the same Constitution strips the High Court of jurisdiction over such matters.
2. For avoidance of doubt, Article 162(2) states as follows:–
‘Parliament shall establish courts with the status of the High Court to hear and determine disputes relating to –
(a) employment and labour relations; and
(b) the environment and the use and occupation of, and title to, land.’
3. On the other hand, Article 165(5) of the Constitution states as follows:-
‘The High Court shall not have jurisdiction in respect of matters-
(a) reserved for the exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under this Constitution; or
(b) falling within the jurisdiction of the courts contemplated in Article 162(2).’
4. In obedience to Article 162(2) of the Constitution, Parliament did, through the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act, No. 20 of 2011, establish such a court, known as the Employment and Labour Relations Court. The jurisdiction of the Employment and Labour Relations Court is set out in section 17 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act. The said court has exclusive original and appellate jurisdiction to hear and determine all disputes referred to it in accordance with Article 162(2) of the Constitution, relating to employment and labour relations, which includes disputes relating to or arising out of employment between an employer and an employee.
5. The pleadings lodged at the lower court turn on the issue that the parties hereto were in an employer and employee relationship at the time material to the dispute at hand. The cause of action is said to have arisen in the course of the said employment. It is alleged in the plaint that the accident the subject of the suit arose on account of a breach of the contract of employment between the two parties or by reason of breach of a statutory duty of care by the employer governing relations between an employer and an employee. The suit therefore turns on matters that relate to industrial or employment or labour relations.
6. In view of everything said so far, it follows that I, sitting as Judge of the High Court, have no jurisdiction to deal with the appeal placed before me. The dispute in question falls squarely within the mandate of the Employment and Labour Relations Court. I shall accordingly direct that the matter be transferred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court sitting at Kisumu for further directions.
PREPARED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KAKAMEGA THIS.........31st .......DAY OF........January........., 2019
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KAKAMEGA THIS......7th......DAY OF........February...............2019
J. NJAGI
JUDGE