[2010] KEHC 2052 (KLR)

[2010] KEHC 2052 (KLR)

The court found that the plea was not properly taken as the language used during plea taking was not indicated and the answer to the charge was not recorded. This contravened section 77(2)(b) of the Constitution, which requires that an accused be informed of the charge in a language he understands. The court also...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] KEHC 2052 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Andrew Wekesa Barasa; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 55 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal_allowed
Judges
FN Muchemi
Legal Topics
Plea Taking, Language of Court, Fitness to Stand Trial, Contradictory Evidence, Preparation to Commit Felony
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Plea Taking Language of Court Fitness to Stand Trial Contradictory Evidence Preparation to Commit Felony

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew Wekesa Barasa

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plea was properly taken in accordance with the law.
  2. 2 Whether the language used in court was indicated and understood by the appellant.
  3. 3 Whether the evidence presented was sufficient to sustain a conviction for preparation to commit a felony.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plea was not properly taken as the language used during plea taking was not indicated and the answer to the charge was not recorded. This contravened section 77(2)(b) of the Constitution, which requires that an accused be informed of the charge in a language he understands. The court also found that the evidence presented was insufficient to sustain a conviction for preparation to commit a felony, as there were material doubts regarding the recovery of the exhibit and contradictions in the prosecution evidence. Consequently, the proceedings were declared null and void, and the conviction and sentence were set aside.

Court Disposition

appeal_allowed

Orders

  • The conviction and sentence are set aside.
  • The appellant is set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.