[2024] KEHC 14556 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 14556 (KLR)

The court found that the Plaintiff was properly served with the Defence and Counter-claim, as evidenced by the Affidavit of Service sworn by Martin Ajega. The Plaintiff failed to file any Defence or Reply within the required time. Pursuant to Order 10 Rules 10 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court is empowered to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 14556 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Angaza Real Estate; Defendant: Consolidated Bank of Kenya Ltd; Defendant: James Onyando Josiah t/a Nyaluonyo Auctioneers
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kiambu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 3 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Directions and Entry of Judgment on Counter Claim
Outcome
Judgment entered against the Plaintiff on the Counter-claim for Kshs.52,815,913.00 plus costs and interest.
Judges
DO Chepkwony
Legal Topics
Default Judgment, Counter Claims, Injunctive Relief, Statutory Power of Sale, Service of Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Default Judgment Counter Claims Injunctive Relief Statutory Power of Sale Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Angaza Real Estate

Plaintiff

Consolidated Bank of Kenya Ltd

Defendant

James Onyando Josiah t/a Nyaluonyo Auctioneers

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Directions and Entry of Judgment on Counter Claim

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff was properly served with the Defence and Counter-claim and failed to respond within the prescribed time.
  2. 2 Whether the 1st Defendant is entitled to judgment on the counter-claim for the sum claimed plus costs and interest.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiff was properly served with the Defence and Counter-claim, as evidenced by the Affidavit of Service sworn by Martin Ajega. The Plaintiff failed to file any Defence or Reply within the required time. Pursuant to Order 10 Rules 10 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court is empowered to enter judgment in favour of the Defendant on the Counter-claim where there is no response from the Plaintiff. Accordingly, judgment was entered against the Plaintiff for the sum claimed in the Counter-claim, together with costs and interest at court rates.

Court Disposition

Judgment entered against the Plaintiff on the Counter-claim for Kshs.52,815,913.00 plus costs and interest.

Orders

  • Judgment is entered against the Plaintiff in the sum of Kshs.52,815,913.00 together with costs and interest of the suit at court rates.