[2019] KEHC 5382 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 5382 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant failed to comply with its order to file and serve the record of appeal within the stipulated period. Neither party appeared on the scheduled hearing date. In the absence of compliance and active prosecution, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the appeal for want of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 5382 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Angeline Achieng; Respondent: Alfred Lupapa
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 8 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Appeal Procedure, Non Compliance With Court Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Appeal Procedure Non Compliance With Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Angeline Achieng

Appellant

Alfred Lupapa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's failure to file and serve the record of appeal as ordered.
  2. 2 Whether any orders as to costs should be made upon dismissal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant failed to comply with its order to file and serve the record of appeal within the stipulated period. Neither party appeared on the scheduled hearing date. In the absence of compliance and active prosecution, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. The court further exercised its discretion not to award costs to either party.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
  • No orders as to costs.