[2023] KEBPRT 701 (KLR)

[2023] KEBPRT 701 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the correspondence from the respondent's advocates, which described her as the legal administrator and demanded rent and vacation of the premises, established the existence of a landlord/tenant relationship. The respondent could not deny her status as landlord after holding herself out as...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEBPRT 701 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Daniel Angira; Respondent: Gladys Ochoi (Sued as the Legal Administrator of the Estate of the Late Jackson Ochoi Ogeto)
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E021 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction and Complaint
Outcome
Application allowed in part; injunction granted; costs awarded to tenant.
Judges
Gakuhi Chege, J Osodo
Legal Topics
Controlled Tenancy, Eviction Procedure, Injunctive Relief, Landlord Tenant Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Controlled Tenancy Eviction Procedure Injunctive Relief Landlord Tenant Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Angira

Applicant

Gladys Ochoi (Sued as the Legal Administrator of the Estate of the Late Jackson Ochoi Ogeto)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction and Complaint

  1. 1 Whether there exists a landlord/tenant relationship between the parties.
  2. 2 Whether the tenant is entitled to injunctive relief restraining eviction and interference with possession.
  3. 3 Who is liable to pay costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the correspondence from the respondent's advocates, which described her as the legal administrator and demanded rent and vacation of the premises, established the existence of a landlord/tenant relationship. The respondent could not deny her status as landlord after holding herself out as such. The notice to vacate issued by the respondent was defective as it did not comply with the statutory requirements under Section 4 of Cap. 301, which mandates a prescribed form and a two-month notice period. The Tribunal held that the respondent's threats of eviction based on this defective notice were unlawful and warranted injunctive relief to protect the tenant's...

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; injunction granted; costs awarded to tenant.

Orders

  • The respondent/landlord is restrained from evicting, harassing, locking and/or interfering with the tenant’s quiet possession and use of the suit premises without following the provisions of Cap. 301.
  • The tenant shall pay any rent in arrears from the date of the original landlord's death to the respondent within 30 days.