[2024] KEELC 6647 (KLR)
The court found that since the application for stay of execution is already before the Court of Appeal and at an advanced stage, and given that the Court of Appeal has issued directions and a status quo order, it is prudent to stay the decree of the trial court to avoid conflicting orders and to preserve the subject...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 6647 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ernest Angwenyi (Suing as the Legal Administrator of the Estate of Hebisiba Bosibori Angwenyi - Deceased); Defendant: Hellen Ogake; Defendant: Seventh Day Adventist Church E.A Union Limited; Defendant: County Surveyor Nyamira County; Defendant: The Hon General
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nyamira
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 22 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for stay of execution granted; decree stayed pending determination of appeal; title deeds to be deposited in court; costs in the cause.
- Judges
- JM Kamau
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Land Register, Stay of Execution, Appeal Procedure, Status Quo Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ernest Angwenyi (Suing as the Legal Administrator of the Estate of Hebisiba Bosibori Angwenyi - Deceased)
Plaintiff
Hellen Ogake
Defendant
Seventh Day Adventist Church E.A Union Limited
Defendant
County Surveyor Nyamira County
Defendant
The Hon General
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should grant a stay of execution of the decree pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeals.
- 2 Whether the deposit of the title deeds in court is necessary to preserve the subject matter of the suit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that since the application for stay of execution is already before the Court of Appeal and at an advanced stage, and given that the Court of Appeal has issued directions and a status quo order, it is prudent to stay the decree of the trial court to avoid conflicting orders and to preserve the subject matter of the appeal. The court further ordered the deposit of the two title deeds and any emanating title deeds in court as a precautionary measure to ensure the integrity of the property pending the outcome of the appellate process. Costs were ordered to be in the cause.
Court Disposition
Application for stay of execution granted; decree stayed pending determination of appeal; title deeds to be deposited in court; costs in the cause.
Orders
- Stay of execution of the decree dated 9/4/2024 and issued on 30/4/2024 is granted pending hearing and determination of the intended appeals.
- The two title deeds and any other title deed emanating therefrom to be deposited in court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
Angwenyi (Suing as the Legal Administrator of the Estate of Hebisiba Bosibori Angwenyi -Deceased) v Ogake & 3 others (Environment & Land Case 22 of 2021) [2024] KEELC 6647 (KLR) (3 October 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 6647 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Nyamira
Environment & Land Case 22 of 2021
JM Kamau, J
October 3, 2024
Between
Ernest Angwenyi
Plaintiff
Suing as the Legal Administrator of the Estate of Hebisiba Bosibori Angwenyi -Deceased
and
Hellen Ogake
1st Defendant
Seventh Day Adventist Church E.A Union Limited
2nd Defendant
County Surveyor Nyamira County
3rd Defendant
The Hon General
4th Defendant
Ruling
1. Judgment in this case was delivered on 9/4/2024 and a Decree drawn to the effect that;-i.There be stay and is hereby granted an order for rectification of the register over and in respect of L.R Nos. Nyansiongo Settlememt Scheme/16 and 17 so that the 2 parcels of land are restored to their original positions before any transfer of any of them was executed and before any mutations were registered in respect of any of the 2 parcels of land and in accordance with the original Map.ii.The 3rd Defendant will bear the Costs of the suit.
2. Thereafter, on the 10/7/2024, the 1st Defendant, Hellen Ogake Aondo moved this court with an Application for the substantive order that:-‘‘pending the hearing and final determination of the intended appeals in the Court of Appeal, this Honourable court be pleased to stay the Decree dated 9/4/2024 and issued on 30/4/2024. ’’
3. A Notice of Appeal has been filed by the 2nd Defendant and as at the time of filing the Application, the 1st Defendant had equally prepared her Notice and was to file the same. Directions at the Court of Appeal had already been given by the Court in Civil Application No.E080 of 2024. The 1st Defendant admits that she was yet to comply with the Court of Appeal Directions. In her Affidavit sworn on 10/7/2024 the 1st Defendant is concerned that should the execution of the Decree take place the several other people, most of who were not parties to this suit, would certainly be affected. She also depones that in the Court of Appeal, there is an order of Status Quo to be maintained granted following an Application by the Plaintiff/Respondent in this case. She did attach to her Affidavit a copy of the Notice of Appeal dated 23/4/2024, a copy of the Directions in respect to the Application in the Court of Appeal dated 25/6/2024. The Application in the Court of Appeal is dated 21/6/2024, by way of Notice of Motion under certificate of urgency.
4. This being the case, and particularly since the Application which is at an advanced stage of being heard in the higher court seeks conservatory orders restraining the alienation, wastage and/or any adverse dealings with the suit property. I will leave the matter to the wisdom of the Court of Appeal and henceforth stay my Decree and specifically the orders directing ‘‘… the rectification of the Register over the parcel of land known as L.R. No.nyansiongo Settlement Scheme/16 & 17 restoring the 2 parcels of land to their original positions before any transfer of the same was executed and before any mutations were registered in respect of any of the 2 parcels of land and in accordance with the original Map…..’’
5. But for the abundance of caution I order that the 2 Title Deeds and any other Title Deed emanating therefrom be deposited in court. Costs to be in the cause.
RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NYAMIRA THIS 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024. MUGO KAMAUJUDGEIn the Presence of:-Court Assistant: BrendaPlaintiff’s Counsel: Mr. MulisaDefendants’ Counsel: Mr. Soire for the 1st and 2nd DefendantsMr. Nderitu for the 3rd and 4th Defendants