[2016] KEHC 4289 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case for the grant of ex parte leave to institute contempt proceedings against the respondent. The evidence showed that the respondent, despite being served with the relevant court order and a notice of contempt, failed to comply with the order of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 4289 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Aniselimo Njeru Mbanda; Respondent: N. K. Nyaga, Land Registrar, Mbeere
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 227 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Leave to Institute Contempt Proceedings
- Outcome
- leave granted to institute contempt proceedings
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Enforcement of Court Orders, Leave to Institute Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aniselimo Njeru Mbanda
Applicant
N. K. Nyaga, Land Registrar, Mbeere
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Leave to Institute Contempt Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has established a prima facie case for grant of leave to institute contempt of court proceedings against the respondent.
- 2 Whether the respondent's conduct amounts to contempt of court for failure to comply with a court order issued by the Senior Principal Magistrate at Siakago.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case for the grant of ex parte leave to institute contempt proceedings against the respondent. The evidence showed that the respondent, despite being served with the relevant court order and a notice of contempt, failed to comply with the order of the Senior Principal Magistrate at Siakago. The court held that such conduct, if proven, would amount to contempt of court and undermine the dignity of the subordinate court. The court was satisfied that the requirements under section 5 of the Judicature Act had been met, and therefore granted the applicant leave to file contempt proceedings against the respondent.
Court Disposition
leave granted to institute contempt proceedings
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to file or institute contempt proceedings against the respondent.
- There will be no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU
MISC CIVIL APPLICATION 227 OF 2015
ANISELIMO NJERU MBANDA................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
N. K. NYAGA, LAND REGISTRAR, MBEERE.....................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. This is an ex parte application brought under Section 5(1) of the Judicature Act (Cap 8) Laws of Kenya seeking ex parte leave to punish the respondent for contempt of court namely for refusing to implement an order issued by the court of the Senior Principle Magistrate at Siakago on 31st January, 2013.
2. The application is brought by way of notice of motion and is supported by the grounds on the face of the motion and a supporting affidavit of the applicant. In his notice of motion counsel for the applicant has stated that the subject order was served on the respondent, who is the District Land Registrar, Mbeere South. After being served on 17th June, 2014, the Respondent contemptuously refused to implement what the order directed her to do. Furthermore, the Land Registrar was again served with a notice of being in contempt on 10th September, 2015. She again refused to comply. According to counsel for the Applicant, the Respondent's conduct undermines the dignity of the court and this kind of disobedience breeds anarchy and is a threat to the rule of Law. In the supporting affidavit, the Applicant has repeated what appears in the notice of motion namely that the Respondent has refused to implement the subject order.
3. According to counsel, the order directing the respondent to implement the court order has not been challenged either by way of appeal or review. He has also stated that the conduct of the respondent amounts to contempt of court. Furthermore, he has stated that the Respondent ought to be punished for disobeying the court order in order to uphold the dignity of the court.
4. According to section 5 (1) of the Judicature Act the High Court and Court of Appeal have the same power to punish for contempt of court as is for the time being possessed by the High of Justice in England, which power shall extend to upholding the dignity of subordinate courts. And in terms of section 5 (2) of the Judicature Act: “an order of the High Court made by way of punishment for contempt of court shall be appealable as if it were a conviction and sentence made in the exercise of the ordinary original criminal jurisdiction of the High Court.”
5. I have perused the affidavit evidence of the applicant and the grounds on the face of the Notice of Motion. I find from the affidavit evidence that the order, which was allegedly not obeyed was issued on 31st January 203 by the court of the Senior Resident Magistrate at Siakago, which is a subordinate court as contemplated by the provisions of section 5 of the Judicature Act. It is that court's dignity that is sought to be upheld. I therefore find that the Applicant has made out a case for the grant of ex parte leave to file for contempt of court proceedings against the Respondent.
6. The ex parteApplicant is hereby granted leave to file or to institute contempt proceedings against the Respondent.
7. There will be no orders to cost.
RULING DATED, SIGNEDand DELIVERED in open court at EMBU this 26thday of MAY 2016
In the presence of Mr Momanyi for the Applicant
Court clerk Njue
J.M. BWONWONGA
JUDGE
26. 05. 16