[2019] KEELC 75 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 75 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant has lived on the suit land since 1990 and stands to suffer substantial loss if a stay is not granted, particularly as the respondent has already taken steps to destroy her property and threatened to demolish her house. The application was made promptly after judgment, and the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 75 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Anita Gakii M’Mwongera; Respondent: David Mbaya
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 87 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application for stay of execution allowed
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Irreparable Harm, Substantial Loss, Appeal Process, Eviction, Judgment Enforcement
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Irreparable Harm Substantial Loss Appeal Process Eviction Judgment Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anita Gakii M’Mwongera

Appellant

David Mbaya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment and decree in Githongo ELC number 45 of 2018 pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated substantial loss or irreparable harm if the stay is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether the application meets the threshold for grant of stay of execution under the law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant has lived on the suit land since 1990 and stands to suffer substantial loss if a stay is not granted, particularly as the respondent has already taken steps to destroy her property and threatened to demolish her house. The application was made promptly after judgment, and the respondent did not oppose the application. The court was satisfied that the applicant met the legal threshold for grant of stay of execution pending appeal and allowed the application for a period of one year, with costs to abide the outcome of the appeal.

Court Disposition

application for stay of execution allowed

Orders

  • A stay of execution of the judgment, decree, and all consequential orders in Githongo ELC number 45 of 2018 is granted for a period of one year pending appeal.
  • The costs of this application shall abide the outcome of the appeal.