[2018] KECA 781 (KLR)

[2018] KECA 781 (KLR)

The court found that the delay in filing the notice of appeal, after excluding the period required for obtaining proceedings, amounted to about four months, which was not inordinate and had been explained by the applicant. The applicant's explanation regarding the missing court file was accepted, despite the lack of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KECA 781 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ann Wambui Eliza; Respondent: Ruita Kabutu
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 56 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal
Outcome
application granted
Judges
DK Musinga
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Adverse Possession, Right of Appeal, Judicial Discretion
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time Adverse Possession Right of Appeal Judicial Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ann Wambui Eliza

Applicant

Ruita Kabutu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason for the delay in filing the notice of appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the notice of appeal is inordinate and unexplained.
  3. 3 Whether the intended appeal has arguable grounds and is not frivolous.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the delay in filing the notice of appeal, after excluding the period required for obtaining proceedings, amounted to about four months, which was not inordinate and had been explained by the applicant. The applicant's explanation regarding the missing court file was accepted, despite the lack of documentary evidence. The court also found that the intended appeal was not frivolous and that the respondent had not demonstrated any prejudice that would result from granting the extension. In the interest of justice and to allow the applicant to exercise her constitutional right of appeal, the court exercised its discretion to grant the extension of time sought.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • The application dated 13th May, 2017 is granted.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs of the application.