[2020] KECA 260 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's delay in filing the notice of appeal was sufficiently explained by the challenges of virtual court proceedings, internet connectivity issues, and late receipt of the judgment. The COVID-19 pandemic's impact on court operations was also considered. The court exercised its...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KECA 260 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Ann Wanja t/a Kanini Merchants; Respondent: Kennedy Masinde
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application E247 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Extension of Time Application / Single Judge Chamber Application
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- S ole Kantai
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Virtual Court Proceedings, Delay Explanation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ann Wanja t/a Kanini Merchants
Applicant
Kennedy Masinde
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Extension of Time Application / Single Judge Chamber Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason for the delay in filing the notice of appeal and record of appeal.
- 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to extend time for filing and serving the notice and record of appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's delay in filing the notice of appeal was sufficiently explained by the challenges of virtual court proceedings, internet connectivity issues, and late receipt of the judgment. The COVID-19 pandemic's impact on court operations was also considered. The court exercised its discretion in favor of the applicant, noting that the decree involved a substantial monetary amount and that the applicant should have an opportunity to challenge the High Court's findings on appeal. No prejudice to the respondent was demonstrated, and the absence of opposition further supported granting the extension.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The applicant shall lodge a notice of appeal within 14 days of the ruling date and serve it on the respondent in accordance with the rules.
- Costs of the motion will be in the intended appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAIROBI
(CROAM: KANTAI, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS)
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. E247 OF 2020
BETWEEN
ANN WANJA T/A KANINI MERCHANTS....APPLICANT
AND
KENNEDY MASINDE..................................RESPONDENT
(An application for leave for extension of time from the Judgment of the High Court of Kenya – Commercial and Tax Division at Nairobi (Kasango, J.) delivered on 28thJuly, 2020 inCivil Suit No. 431 of 2016)
*********************
RULING
I am asked in the Motion dated 19th August, 2020 brought under various provisions of law to grant leave to the applicant to extend the time within which to file and serve Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal arising from the Judgment of Kasango, J. delivered on 28th August, 2020 in HC Commercial and Tax Division Civil Suit No. 431 of 2018. From what I can glean from the Motion and the affidavit of Allan George Njogu Kamau, advocate, the Judge entered Judgment against the applicant in favour of the respondent for Kshs.6,824,750plus interest and dismissed the applicant’s counter-claim.
On reasons why an appeal was not filed on time it is said in grounds in support of the Motion and in the affidavit that delivery of the Judgment was adjourned several times for not being ready; that on 28th July, 2020 Miss Cynthia Nyabuto, an advocate in the lawyers on record for the applicant had challenges with the internet in accessing the virtual delivery of the Judgment forcing her to communication with lawyers for the respondents by e-mail; that those lawyers wrote back the next day 29th July, 2020 advising that Judgment had been delivered in favour for the respondents but they didn’t have a copy of the same; that the applicant was furnished with a copy of the judgment on 11th August, 2020 by which time for filing notice of appeal in accordance with the rules had lapsed; that the applicant is dissatisfied with the findings of the High Court and intends to appeal to this Court and, finally, delay was not intentional.
I did not see any replying affidavit.
I have considered material placed before me and I take the following view of the matter.
The principles which I need to consider in an application of this nature were well set out in the case of Leo Sila Mutiso v Rose Wangari Mwangi [1999] 2 EA 233. They were identified to be:
“It is now well settled that the decision whether or not to extend the time for appealing is essentially discretionary. It is also well settled that in general the matters which this Court takes into account in deciding whether to grant an extension of time are first the length of the delay secondly, the reason for the delay, thirdly (possibly) the chances of the appeal succeeding if the application is granted and fourthly, the degree of prejudice to the respondent if the application is granted".
Judgment intended to be appealed was delivered on 28th July, 2020 and the lawyers on record were aware of that date. It is said that a lawyer in that firm tried to access the virtual proceedings but had difficulty with the internet forcing her to communicate with the lawyers on the opposite side who confirmed that a judgment had indeed been delivered in favour of the respondent. The applicant’s lawyers made various attempts to get a copy of Judgment but only obtained a copy on 11th August, 2020 that they obtained a copy. They were thus unable to file a Notice of Appeal within the time stipulated by the rules of this Court.
It seems to me in those premises that the lawyers for the applicant made attempts to obtain a copy of the Judgment though follow-ups with the Court Registry. It is not lost to me that the prevailing COVID-19 pandemic has affected court operations where some court operations are being conducted virtually, some time with attendant internet challenges. Delay has been sufficiently explained. I note that the decree by the High Court is for money; the amount is not unsubstantial. The applicant should have an opportunity to challenge the findings on appeal.
I allow the Motion dated 19th August, 2020. Let the applicant lodge a notice of appeal within 14 days of today and serve it on the respondent in accordance with the rules. Costs of the Motion will be in the intended appeal.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 23rdday of October, 2020.
S. ole KANTAI
……………………………
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
Signed
DEPUTY REGISTRAR