[2022] KEHC 1054 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 1054 (KLR)

The court found that the appellants had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of a stay of execution pending appeal, particularly the risk of substantial loss and the possibility that the respondent may not be able to refund the decretal sum if the appeal succeeds. However, the court balanced the interests...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 1054 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Annah Mutehu Ndunda; Appellant: Joseph Kabui Mathaiya; Respondent: Ann Wanjeri Mwangi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyahururu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E024 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Stay of Execution Application Pending Appeal
Outcome
Stay of execution granted on condition of security; directions on deposit of sums; costs in the appeal.
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Security for Decretal Sum, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Security for Decretal Sum Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Annah Mutehu Ndunda

Appellant

Joseph Kabui Mathaiya

Appellant

Ann Wanjeri Mwangi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Stay of Execution Application Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellants are entitled to a stay of execution of the decree pending appeal.
  2. 2 What security, if any, should be ordered as a condition for stay of execution.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent's ability to refund the decretal sum if the appeal succeeds is in doubt.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellants had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of a stay of execution pending appeal, particularly the risk of substantial loss and the possibility that the respondent may not be able to refund the decretal sum if the appeal succeeds. However, the court balanced the interests of both parties by ordering that Kshs.1 million be deposited in a joint account of the parties' advocates and Kshs.500,000 be deposited with the respondent's advocate within 45 days as security. The stay was made conditional upon compliance with these security requirements, failing which the stay would lapse and execution would proceed. The court further directed the parties to...

Court Disposition

Stay of execution granted on condition of security; directions on deposit of sums; costs in the appeal.

Orders

  • Stay of execution is granted on condition that Kshs.1,000,000 is deposited in a joint account of the parties' advocates and Kshs.500,000 is deposited with the respondent's advocate within 45 days.
  • The parties are to expedite the hearing and determination of the appeal.