[2018] KEELC 3523 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated a prima facie case by providing uncontroverted evidence of ownership and possession of the suit property, including documentation of the transfer and issuance of a share certificate. The respondents failed to file any response or challenge the applicant's evidence....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELC 3523 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Annah Mwihaki Kamau; Respondent: Pastor Ken; Respondent: Dominic Gathecha Kinyua; Interested Party: Lucky Summer Estate Limited
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 1017 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
- Outcome
- interlocutory injunction granted
- Legal Topics
- Injunctive Relief, Trespass, Beneficial Ownership, Transfer of Land, Share Certificates
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Annah Mwihaki Kamau
Applicant
Pastor Ken
Respondent
Dominic Gathecha Kinyua
Respondent
Lucky Summer Estate Limited
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has established a prima facie case with a probability of success to warrant the grant of an interlocutory injunction.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to injunctive relief restraining the respondents from interfering with her possession and enjoyment of the suit property.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated a prima facie case by providing uncontroverted evidence of ownership and possession of the suit property, including documentation of the transfer and issuance of a share certificate. The respondents failed to file any response or challenge the applicant's evidence. In the absence of any rebuttal, the court was satisfied that the applicant was entitled to protection of her proprietary interests pending the hearing and determination of the suit. Accordingly, the court granted a temporary injunction restraining the respondents from trespassing, depositing building materials, or interfering with the applicant's enjoyment and possession of...
Court Disposition
interlocutory injunction granted
Orders
- A temporary order of injunction restraining the defendants, their servants, employees, agents, assigns or any other person claiming under them or through them from committing acts of trespass and further digging of trenches and/or depositing building materials and or interfering with the plaintiff’s enjoyment and...
- The defendants shall bear the costs of this application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
ELC NO.1017 OF 2016
ANNAH MWIHAKI KAMAU.......................PLAITTIFF/APPLICANT
=VERSUS=
PASTOR KEN..............................................................1ST DEFENDANT
DOMINIC GATHECHA KINYUA...........................2ND DEFENDANT
AND
LUCKY SUMMER ESTATE LIMITED..........INTERESTED PARTY
RULING
1. This is a Ruling in respect of an application dated 22nd August 2016, filed by the plaintiff/applicant. The application was duly served upon the respondents but none of them filed a response to the same. The application seeks injunctive orders against the defendants/respondents.
2. The applicant contends that she is the beneficial owner of LR 31 Ruaraka Plot 666 (R 690) (suit property). The applicant purchased the suit property from one Sammy Njihia Karanja who had purchased the same from Lucky Summer Estate Limited who is named as the interested party herein.
3. Upon purchase of the suit property she paid the requisite money upon which the records held by the interested party were changed to reflect her name as owner of the suit property. She was issued with share certificate in respect of the suit property. The respondents trespassed into the suit property in the year 2016 and deposited building materials on it and started digging a foundation on the same. She moved to court and obtained temporary injunction pending hearing and determination of the application.
4. This being an application for injunction the only issue for determination is whether the applicant has demonstrated that she has a prima facie case with probability of success. I have perused the documents annexed to the supporting affidavit. The documents show that the applicant had the suit property transferred from Sammy Njihia Karanja to her name on 9/2/2016. She was issued with a share certificate on 24th February 2016. The documents further show that prior to the transfer, the plot documents were in the name of Sammy Njihia Karanja. There is no evidence to controvert the evidence of the applicant. I find that the applicant has demonstrated that she has a prima facie case. I therefore grant the following orders:-
a. A temporary order of injunction restraining the defendants, their servants, employees, agents, assigns or any other person claiming under them or through them from committing acts of trespass and further digging of trenches and/or depositing building materials and or interfering with the plaintiff’s enjoyment and possession of LR 31 Ruaraka plot No .666 (R 690) pending hearing and determination of this suit.
b. The defendants shall bear the costs of this application.
It is so ordered.
Dated, Signed and delivered at Nairobi on this 19th day of March 2018.
E.O.OBAGA
JUDGE
In the absence of parties who were aware of the date and time of delivery of Ruling.
Court Assistant: Kevin
E.O.OBAGA
JUDGE