[2017] KEELRC 1455 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1455 (KLR)

The court found that the petitioner failed to rebut the respondents' defence that the interdiction was legitimate and in accordance with the law, given that she had been charged with a criminal offence. The absence of a show cause notice was not sufficiently established as a breach of procedure, and the petitioner...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1455 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Anne Chepkorir Turgut; Respondent: County Government of Bomet; Respondent: County Public Service Board – Bomet County; Respondent: Jonathan Soi
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 6 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the respondents
Judges
DKN Marete
Legal Topics
Suspension of Employee, Interdiction Procedure, Fair Hearing Rights, Disciplinary Process, Criminal Charges and Employment
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Suspension of Employee Interdiction Procedure Fair Hearing Rights Disciplinary Process Criminal Charges and Employment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anne Chepkorir Turgut

Applicant

County Government of Bomet

Respondent

County Public Service Board – Bomet County

Respondent

Jonathan Soi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Conservatory Orders

  1. 1 Whether the petitioner is entitled to conservatory orders restraining suspension or interdiction pending determination of the petition.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents followed due process in initiating disciplinary action against the petitioner.
  3. 3 Whether the petitioner is entitled to full salary during interdiction or suspension.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the petitioner failed to rebut the respondents' defence that the interdiction was legitimate and in accordance with the law, given that she had been charged with a criminal offence. The absence of a show cause notice was not sufficiently established as a breach of procedure, and the petitioner did not demonstrate a prima facie case or risk of irreparable harm warranting conservatory orders. The application was therefore dismissed with costs to the respondents.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the respondents

Orders

  • The application dated 6th April, 2017 is dismissed with costs to the respondents.