[2022] KEBPRT 208 (KLR)

[2022] KEBPRT 208 (KLR)

The tribunal found that the applicant had vacated the demised premises and a new tenant had taken possession, as evidenced by affidavits and a letter of offer. Consequently, the landlord/tenant relationship between the parties had ceased. Since the tribunal's jurisdiction is predicated on the existence of such a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEBPRT 208 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Annie Wanjiku Kibeh t/a Aniq Elegance Fashion Trends; Respondent: Juja City Mall Limited; Respondent: Auckland Agencies Auctioneers
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E640 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Withdrawal After Loss of Jurisdiction
Outcome
reference and application withdrawn; no order as to costs
Judges
Gakuhi Chege
Legal Topics
Landlord Tenant Relationship, Vacant Possession, Jurisdiction of Tribunal
Source Language
en
Land and Property Landlord Tenant Relationship Vacant Possession Jurisdiction of Tribunal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Annie Wanjiku Kibeh t/a Aniq Elegance Fashion Trends

Applicant

Juja City Mall Limited

Respondent

Auckland Agencies Auctioneers

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Withdrawal After Loss of Jurisdiction

  1. 1 Whether the landlord/tenant relationship between the parties still subsists.
  2. 2 Whether the tribunal retains jurisdiction after the tenant has vacated the premises.

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the applicant had vacated the demised premises and a new tenant had taken possession, as evidenced by affidavits and a letter of offer. Consequently, the landlord/tenant relationship between the parties had ceased. Since the tribunal's jurisdiction is predicated on the existence of such a relationship, it no longer had authority to entertain further proceedings. The reference and application were therefore marked as withdrawn, with no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

reference and application withdrawn; no order as to costs

Orders

  • The reference and application dated November 1, 2021 are marked as withdrawn.
  • There is no order as to costs.