[2021] KEHC 5389 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 5389 (KLR)

The court found that Andrian Kenya Limited, the objector, had proved on a balance of probabilities that it is a separate and distinct legal entity from the judgment debtor, Andrian Company Limited. The objector was not a party to the original suit, and the attached property and premises belonged to it, not the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 5389 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Anthony Karanja Wainaina; Applicant: Joseph M. Gikonyo t/a Garam Investments Auctioneers; Respondent: Andrian Company Limited; Applicant: Andrian Kenya Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E054 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Objection to Attachment and Proclamation
Outcome
application granted
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Execution of Decree, Attachment of Property, Third Party Claims, Company Separateness
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Civil Procedure Execution of Decree Attachment of Property Third Party Claims Company Separateness

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anthony Karanja Wainaina

Applicant

Joseph M. Gikonyo t/a Garam Investments Auctioneers

Applicant

Andrian Company Limited

Respondent

Andrian Kenya Limited

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Objection to Attachment and Proclamation

  1. 1 Whether the property proclaimed and attached by the auctioneers belonged to the judgment debtor or to a third party objector.
  2. 2 Whether the objector, Andrian Kenya Limited, is a separate legal entity from the judgment debtor, Andrian Company Limited.
  3. 3 Whether the warrants of attachment and proclamation should be cancelled due to wrongful attachment of third party property.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Andrian Kenya Limited, the objector, had proved on a balance of probabilities that it is a separate and distinct legal entity from the judgment debtor, Andrian Company Limited. The objector was not a party to the original suit, and the attached property and premises belonged to it, not the judgment debtor. The decree holder failed to discharge the evidential burden of proving that the objector and judgment debtor were the same entity or that the attached property belonged to the judgment debtor. Consequently, the attachment and proclamation were wrongful, and the warrants of attachment and proclamation were cancelled. The court exercised its discretion to set aside...

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • The warrant of attachment of movable property dated 23rd September 2020 is cancelled.
  • The proclamation dated 30th September 2020 served upon the applicant by Graham Investments Auctioneers is lifted.