[2017] KEELRC 734 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 734 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent terminated the claimant's employment under the guise of retrenchment but failed to comply with the mandatory procedural requirements of Section 40 of the Employment Act, 2007, including giving notice to the claimant and the labour officer and paying terminal benefits. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 734 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Anthony Lusenaka Namunyu; Respondent: Africa PS Firms Development Company Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1028 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Retrenchment Procedure, Notice Pay, Salary Arrears, Severance Pay, Compensation for Loss of Employment
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Retrenchment Procedure Notice Pay Salary Arrears Severance Pay Compensation for Loss of Employment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anthony Lusenaka Namunyu

Claimant

Africa PS Firms Development Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly and unlawfully terminated from employment.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent complied with the retrenchment procedure under Section 40 of the Employment Act, 2007.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to salary arrears, notice pay, and compensation for unfair termination.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent terminated the claimant's employment under the guise of retrenchment but failed to comply with the mandatory procedural requirements of Section 40 of the Employment Act, 2007, including giving notice to the claimant and the labour officer and paying terminal benefits. The respondent also failed to pay the claimant his full salary as agreed in the contract. The termination was therefore both substantively and procedurally unfair. The claimant was entitled to salary arrears, notice pay, and compensation for unfair termination, as the respondent's actions violated statutory requirements and denied the claimant an opportunity to prepare for the loss of...

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs.330,000 as notice pay.
  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs.1,820,000 as salary arrears.