[2012] KEHC 3816 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant, by his own admission, had sexual intercourse with a mentally retarded and mute girl who lacked the capacity to consent or understand the act. The law prescribes a minimum sentence of ten years for such an offence, and the circumstances did not warrant any interference with the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 3816 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Anthony Mbugua Muturi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 479 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Sentencing, Capacity to Consent
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Mbugua Muturi
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction and sentence under Section 3(3) of the Sexual Offences Act was proper in light of the circumstances.
- 2 Whether the sentence of ten years' imprisonment should be interfered with on appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant, by his own admission, had sexual intercourse with a mentally retarded and mute girl who lacked the capacity to consent or understand the act. The law prescribes a minimum sentence of ten years for such an offence, and the circumstances did not warrant any interference with the sentence. The appellant's youth and potential for societal contribution did not outweigh the gravity of exploiting a vulnerable victim. Therefore, the appeal against sentence was dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- Right of appeal within 14 days explained to the appellant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
(MILIMANI LAW COURTS)
CRIMINAL APPEAL 479 OF 2008
ANTHONY MBUGUA MUTURI.................................................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC................................................................................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The appellant was convicted under Section 3(3)of theSexual Offences Act No. 3of 2006. He was sentenced to ten years which is the minimum sentence provided by the act.
2. In view of the circumstances of the offence in which by his own admission the appellant had sexual intercourse with a mentally retarded girl who was also mute. It is obvious that she had no capacity to consent or even to understand the act which was being subjected to.
3. Indeed the appellant is a young man in the prime of his life who should be out there contributing to nation building but he chose to act like a bird of prey which takes advantage of the weak and disadvantaged in society instead of protecting and looking after them.
4. In the circumstances of this case the sentence cannot be interfered with.
Reasons wherefore I dismiss the appeal.
SIGNED DATEDandDELIVEREDin open court this 25thday of April 2012.
Court:
Right of appeal within 14 days explained to the appellant.
Copy of Ruling may be availed to the appellant
L. A. ACHODE
JUDGE