[2014] KEHC 6139 (KLR)
The court found that the 2nd applicant was not a flight risk, especially in light of the prosecution's concession and the applicant's evidence of permanent residence. For the 1st applicant, the court determined that previous concerns about flight risk had been mitigated by her willingness to deposit her passport and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 6139 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Antoinette Uwineza Alias Michelin Uwababyyi; Applicant: Alexander Kiole Mutie; Applicant: Kassim Odiwuor Alias Odi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case 45 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Applications and Review
- Outcome
- Bail granted to all three applicants with specific conditions.
- Judges
- CC Kipkorir
- Legal Topics
- Bail Application, Flight Risk Assessment, Bond Conditions, Review of Bail, Pretrial Release
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Antoinette Uwineza Alias Michelin Uwababyyi
Applicant
Alexander Kiole Mutie
Applicant
Kassim Odiwuor Alias Odi
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Applications and Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants should be granted bail pending trial.
- 2 Whether the 1st and 2nd applicants remain a flight risk after new evidence and undertakings.
- 3 What conditions, if any, should be imposed to secure the applicants' attendance at trial.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the 2nd applicant was not a flight risk, especially in light of the prosecution's concession and the applicant's evidence of permanent residence. For the 1st applicant, the court determined that previous concerns about flight risk had been mitigated by her willingness to deposit her passport and provide Kenyan sureties. The 3rd applicant, having no negative antecedents and no evidence presented by the prosecution to suggest otherwise, was also found not to be a flight risk. The court exercised its discretion to grant bail to all three applicants, subject to specific conditions tailored to each accused to ensure their attendance at trial and prevent interference with...
Court Disposition
Bail granted to all three applicants with specific conditions.
Orders
- 1st applicant to pay cash bail of KES 1,000,000 with two Kenyan sureties of KES 1,000,000 each, deposit passport within 24 hours, not leave jurisdiction without court order, report to investigating officer biweekly, not interfere with witnesses, attend monthly mention.
- 2nd applicant to execute personal bond of KES 500,000 with one surety of like amount, provide evidence of permanent abode, attend monthly mention.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
48 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 45 OF 2013
ANTOINETTE UWINEZA ALIAS
MICHELIN UWABABYYI ………………...….....................1ST APPLICANT
ALEXANDER KIOLE MUTIE………………..…….……...2ND APPLICANT
KASSIM ODIWUOR ALIAS ODI ………….....……….…3RD APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC……………………………...................................RESPONDENT
RULING
This ruling relates to a review application for bail filed by the 1st and 2nd accused and an initial application for bail filed by the 3rd accused respectively. By my ruling dated 22nd July 2013 I denied the 1st and 2nd accused bail principally because I came to the conclusion that they posed a flight risk and were not likely to attend trial.
The 1st accused is a foreign national. At the time of her 1st application she had no passport, work permit or permanent residence. She states in her review application that her passport is awaiting collection at the Rwandan Embassy and that she shall provide Kenyan securities if released.
The 2nd accused in his review application dated 6th September 2013 states that he was arrested and charged merely because he was found in possession of a mobile phone belonging to the deceased. He depones in his supporting affidavit that he purchased the mobile phone from the 3rd accused. He further depones that he is not a flight risk and also gives particulars of his rural home and his temporary residence in Nairobi.
The application by the third accused is an initial application. In his application dated 5th September 2013, he stated that he was not a flight risk and will avail himself for trial if released on bail.
I have considered all three applications. The application in respect of the 2nd accused was conceded at the hearing by Mr. Okeyo, the learned Prosecution Counsel. He informed the court that the State was considering withdrawing the charges against the 2nd accused. I have, in the light of this submission and the applicant’s averments demonstrating his usual place of abode and permanent residence, formed the opinion that the 2nd accused does not pose any flight risk.
In respect of the 1st accused the record reflects that her counsel has in the past sought an order from the court to facilitate the collection of her passport at the Rwandan Embassy. She has also deposed in her supporting affidavit that she will attend court whenever required. I consider that the risks which I addressed in my earlier ruling are now minimal and can be taken care of by conditions to be imposed by the court.
The third accused was arraigned in court after the 1st and 2nd accused. There is nothing in the replying affidavit of Ag. IP Joseph Gichuki and the submissions of the prosecution counsel to explain why he was arrested later. In the absence of any averments to suggest any negative antecedents I will exercise my discretion to grant him bail.
In the result, all 3 applicants are granted bail on terms specific to each accused as follows:-
1st accused – Antoinette Uwineza Alias Michelin Uwababyyi, shall
Pay cash bail of One Million Shillings (Kshs.1Million) with two Kenyan sureties of KShs.1Million each to be approved by the Deputy Registrar of the court.
Shall collect and deposit her passport with the court within 24 hours of her release from custody.
Not leave the jurisdiction of this court without an order of the court.
Report to the Investigating Officer at Pangani Police Station once every two weeks until further orders of the court.
Not communicate with or in any manner whatsoever interfere with any of the prosecution witnesses.
Attend court (before the Deputy Registrar) for the mention of this case once every month. The first such mention shall be on 9th of April, 2014.
2nd accused: Alexander Kiole Mutie, shall
Execute a personal bond of KShs.500,000/- and one surety of like amount.
Provide evidence of his expected place of permanent abode and address upon release.
Attend the monthly mention of his case before the Deputy Registrar of the Court. The first such mention shall be on 9th April, 2014.
3rd Accused- Kassim Odiwuor Alias Odi, shall
Execute a personal bond of KShs.1 Million with two sureties of like amount.
Provide evidence of his expected place of permanent abode and address upon release.
Not leave the jurisdiction of this court without an order of the court.
Report to the Investigating Officer at Pangani Police Station once every two weeks until further orders of the court.
Attend the monthly mention of his case before the Deputy Registrar of the Court. The first such mention shall be on 9th April, 2014.
Orders accordingly.
Ruling delivered, dated and signed at Nairobi this 4th day of March, 2014
R. LAGAT - KORIR
JUDGE
In the presence of:
…………………………….: Court clerk
……………………………: 1st applicant
……………………………: 2nd applicant
……………………………: 3rd applicant
……………………………: For 1st applicant
……………………………: For 2nd applicant
……………………………: For 3rd applicant
………………………….: For the State/respondent