[2001] KECA 323 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal found that there was credible and overwhelming evidence from prosecution witnesses who saw the appellant assaulting the complainant with a metal bar. The court held that this evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction for assault causing actual bodily harm under section 251 of the Penal...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] KECA 323 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Antony Chege Kibathi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 129 of 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal (court of Appeal)
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Judges
- JE Gicheru, D Ole Keiwua
- Legal Topics
- Grievous Harm, Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm, Standard of Proof, Evidence Assessment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Antony Chege Kibathi
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal (court of Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the evidence on record was sufficient to support the conviction for assault causing actual bodily harm.
- 2 Whether the charge was proved beyond reasonable doubt.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal found that there was credible and overwhelming evidence from prosecution witnesses who saw the appellant assaulting the complainant with a metal bar. The court held that this evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction for assault causing actual bodily harm under section 251 of the Penal Code. The court rejected the appellant's argument that there was no evidence to support the conviction and affirmed the findings of the superior court. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed and the conviction and sentence as substituted by the High Court were upheld.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The conviction and sentence as substituted by the High Court are upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GICHERU, LAKHA & KEIWUA, JJ.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 129 OF 2001
BETWEEN
ANTONY CHEGE KIBATHI .................................. APPELLANT
AND
REPUBLIC ........................................................ RESPONDENT
(Appeal from a Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Justice Etyang) dated 31st August, 2001
in
H.C.CR.A. NO. 889 OF 2001) *****************
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
ANTHONY CHEGE KIBATHI, the appellant in this appeal; was convicted by the Resident Magistrate Shem Kebong'o sitting at Gatundu of the offence of grievous harm contrary to Section234 of the Penal Code and was sentenced to serve three years' imprisonment. His appeal against this conviction and sentence to the superior court resulted in that conviction being quashed and substituted by a conviction for the offence of assault causing actual bodily harm contrary to section 251 ofthe Penal Code. The sentence was also set aside and substituted with one of eighteen months' imprisonment from the date of his conviction. He has now appealed to this Court against that decision.
The main ground of objection raised on his behalf in this appeal was that if the evidence in the case was properly assessed, there was no evidence at all to support the conviction. In support of this view, it was submitted, that the charge had not been proved beyond reasonable doubt and that on first appeal, the superior court itself felt so doubtful that it quashed the conviction of the offence with which the appellant was convicted.
As regards this ground which we agree raised a matter of law properly for decision by this Court, namely, in the submission that the finding in fact has no evidence to support it, we have come to the conclusion that there is evidence on record capable of being taken into consideration to sustain the charge.
There was overwhelming evidence of P.W.1. , P.W.4 and P.W.5. who testified that upon their arrival at the scene, they found the appellant armed with a metal bar and still hitting the complainant.
We certainly cannot hold that there was no evidence of this fact and that being so, we must dismiss this appeal and it is dismissed accordingly.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 7th day of December, 2001.
J.E. GICHERU ......................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
A.A. LAKHA .......................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
M. KEIWUA ......................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR