[2006] KEHC 1436 (KLR)
The court exercised its discretion under section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code, finding that the applicants had demonstrated overwhelming chances of success in their appeals. It held that it would be unnecessary to keep the applicants in jail if their convictions were likely to be quashed and sentences set...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 1436 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Antony Wafula; Applicant: Habibu Walela; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 32 & 33 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Applicants admitted to bail pending appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Trespass Offences, Sentencing, Discretionary Powers
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Antony Wafula
Applicant
Habibu Walela
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants should be granted bail pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the appeals have overwhelming chances of success.
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion under section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code, finding that the applicants had demonstrated overwhelming chances of success in their appeals. It held that it would be unnecessary to keep the applicants in jail if their convictions were likely to be quashed and sentences set aside. Accordingly, the court admitted the applicants to bail pending appeal on condition that they sign personal bonds of KES 20,000 each and attend court for the hearing of their appeals.
Court Disposition
Applicants admitted to bail pending appeal.
Orders
- Applicants to be released on personal bonds of KES 20,000 each pending appeal.
- Applicants must attend court for the hearing of their appeals.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KAKAMEGA
Criminal Appeal 32 & 33 of 2006
1. ANTONY WAFULA
2. HABIBU WALELA .............................................................................................................. APPLICANTS
V E R S U S
REPUBLIC ...............................................................................................................................RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
The Applicants, Antony Wafula and Habibu Walela, were charged jointly in Kakamega Chief Magistrate Criminal Case No.1907 of 2001 with the offence of trespass with intent to annoy contrary to section 5(1) of the Trespass Act, Chapter 294 of the Laws of Kenya. They pleaded not guilty and a full fledged trial ensued at the end of which both were on 14-3-06 found guilty, convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Shs.2000/= each and in default a term of six months imprisonment. On 24. 3.06 they each filed appeal against conviction and sentence.
In their identical applications by Chamber Summons supported by identical affidavits, the applicants sought bail pending appeal. They submit in their affidavits that their appeals have high chances of succeeding and that they may complete their sentences before the appeals are heard.
Mrs. Kithaka, Senior Principal State Counsel did not oppose the applications but she assigned no reasons for doing so.
I have perused the proceedings and the Petition of Appeal as well as the judgment of J. M. Anunda, DMII Professional. The court has unlimited discretionary power under section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code, Cap 75 of the Laws of Kenya, to admit an applicant to bail where such applicant has lodged an appeal and has demonstrated that the appeal has overwhelming chances of success. The grant of bail pending appeal in such cases is predicated on the premise that it would be unnecessary to keep an applicant in jail if his conviction will eventually be quashed and sentence set aside. That has been demonstrated here. For this reason, I admit the applicants to bail pending appeal on the terms that they shall sign personal bonds of Shs.20000/= each. They are cautioned that they must attend court for the hearing of their appeals.
Dated, signed and delivered at Kakamega this 4th day of April, 2006.
G. B. M. KARIUKI
J U D G E