[2016] KEHC 6623 (KLR)
The court found that while the respondents had not taken the court orders as seriously as required, there was no evidence of malice or blatant disobedience. The respondents had apologized, pledged compliance, and demonstrated law-abiding conduct by attending court as required. Given these mitigating factors and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 6623 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Antony Wahome; Respondent: Parminder Saimbi; Respondent: Amos Weru; Respondent: Riaz Abdulgani
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 53 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Sentencing for Contempt of Court
- Outcome
- Each respondent sentenced to pay a fine of KES 10,000 within 15 days; each party to bear their own costs.
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Enforcement of Court Orders, Mitigation of Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Antony Wahome
Applicant
Parminder Saimbi
Respondent
Amos Weru
Respondent
Riaz Abdulgani
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Sentencing for Contempt of Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents should be punished for contempt of court for disobeying court orders.
- 2 What is the appropriate sentence for the respondents found guilty of contempt of court.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while the respondents had not taken the court orders as seriously as required, there was no evidence of malice or blatant disobedience. The respondents had apologized, pledged compliance, and demonstrated law-abiding conduct by attending court as required. Given these mitigating factors and the ongoing efforts to settle the dispute amicably, the court determined that a custodial sentence was unnecessary and that a monetary fine was a proportionate and sufficient penalty for the contempt committed.
Court Disposition
Each respondent sentenced to pay a fine of KES 10,000 within 15 days; each party to bear their own costs.
Orders
- Each respondent shall pay a fine of KES 10,000 within 15 days from the date of the order.
- Each party shall bear their own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CIVIL SUIT NO. 53 OF 2013
ANTONY WAHOME.......................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
PARMINDER SAIMBI.........................................1ST RESPONDENT
AMOS WERU ....................................................2ND RESPONDENT
RIAZ ABDULGANI..............................................3RD RESPONDENT
(Sued as officials and the management committee of KENYA RGIMENT RIFLE CLUB)
ORDER ON SENTENCE
FOR CONTEMPT
1) On 11th December 2015, this court found the Respondents, namely Parminder Saimbi, Amos Weru and Riaz Abdulgani the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Respondents respectively guilt for contempt on the application of Anthony Wahome. The Respondents’ learned advocates were invited to make submission in mitigation before sentence.
2) In the motion dated 20th May 2015, the Applicant sought to have the Respondents to each serve 6 months custodial sentence for contempt with a fine of kshs.1,000,000/=. Mr. Kaimenyi learned advocate for 1st and 3rd defendant to be lenient to the Respondents because the duo did not exhibit any malice when they breached the court order. He further pointed out that the Respondents believed that they have all the time been complying with the court order and that they acted in good faith. The duo also argued that the omission to sent or forward email to the Respondents and other members of Kenya regiment.
3) Rifle Club was not in any way intentional. It is also said that there have been no disciplinary matters conducted since the orders were issued. The Respondents pledged to obey any orders issued by this court. They also stated that if given a chance they are ready to plunge the contempt.
4) They profusely apologised and sought for the pardon of this court.
5) Mr. Buteti, learned advocate for the 2nd Respondent adopted the submissions for Mr. Kaimenyi. The learned advocate pointed out that Amos Weru, the 2nd Respondent was not a member of the executive committee of the club the time of the issuance of the court order. Mr. Buteti argued that whereas the court order was issued on 27. 2.2013 while the same was allegedly breached on 14th April 2013. By 24th February 2013, it is argued that Mr. Amos Weru was voted out hence he was not in a position to even comply with the court order. The learned advocate informed this court that parties to the club have had discussions and have largely reconciled.
6) I have considered the mitigating factors submitted by learned counsels on behalf of the Respondents. The Respondents have profusely tendered their apologies to this court. They have each pledged to comply with orders of this court. It is clear in my mind that the Respondents may not have taken seriously the court orders issued and served upon them. It would appear they had no malice to blatantly disobey the court orders. This court has a wide range of sentences it can impose against such contemnors. In the circumstances of this case I think a fine as opposed to a custodial sentence is appropriate. The Respondents have religiously appeared in court when summoned. Their demeanour indicated that the Respondents are law abiding citizens who are ready to submit themselves before the court. They willingly obeyed ten court summonses without this court utilizing its coercive powers.
7) I hereby sentence each Respondent to pay a fine of ksh.10,000/= within the next 15 days from the date hereof. Since the parties are in the process of amicably settling this dispute out of court, I order that each party meets his own costs.
Dated, Signed and Delivered in open court this 19th day of February, 2016
J. K. SERGON
JUDGE
In the presence of:
.................................................... for the Applicant
..................................................... for the Respondent