[2008] KEHC 429 (KLR)
The court found that since Mununga Tea Factory has made a claim over the funds held by the garnishee on behalf of the judgment debtor, and given that the funds are also subject to police investigation, it is necessary in the interests of justice to allow Mununga Tea Factory to be heard before making a final...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 429 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Antony Waswa t/a Atomupex Enterprises; Defendant: Ngera Muthami t/a Rozina Transporters; Garnishee: Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 108 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Interlocutory Application (garnishee Proceedings)
- Outcome
- Ruling reserved; directions issued for third party to be heard.
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Garnishee Orders, Enforcement of Judgments, Third Party Claims
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Antony Waswa t/a Atomupex Enterprises
Plaintiff
Ngera Muthami t/a Rozina Transporters
Defendant
Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited
Garnishee
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Interlocutory Application (garnishee Proceedings)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the funds held by the garnishee in account no. 0110070011300 can be released to the plaintiff as judgment creditor.
- 2 Whether Mununga Tea Factory has a legitimate claim over the funds held by the garnishee on behalf of the judgment debtor.
- 3 Whether the interests of justice require Mununga Tea Factory to be heard before final orders are made.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that since Mununga Tea Factory has made a claim over the funds held by the garnishee on behalf of the judgment debtor, and given that the funds are also subject to police investigation, it is necessary in the interests of justice to allow Mununga Tea Factory to be heard before making a final determination on the plaintiff's application. The court therefore reserved its ruling on the application and directed that Mununga Tea Factory be served with notice to file an affidavit explaining their claim, if any, over the funds. The court further directed that the garnishee nisi remain in force until further orders are made.
Court Disposition
Ruling reserved; directions issued for third party to be heard.
Orders
- The Deputy Registrar to serve notice upon Mununga Tea Factory to file an affidavit explaining their claim, if any, over the judgment debtor's funds held in account no. 0110070011300.
- The matter to be mentioned on 2nd December 2008 for further directions and possible final ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
12 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI
Civil Suit 108 of 2008
ANTONY WASWA T/ATOMUPEX ENTERPRISES …..................… PLAINTIFF
Versus
NGERA MUTHAMI T/A ROZINA TRANSPORTERS ………….… DEFENDANT
And
CO-OPERATIVE BANK OF KENYA LIMITED………......………… GARNISHEE
RULING
The plaintiff filed the chamber summons dated 8th October 2008. By that application the plaintiff seeks that the Garnishee the co-operative bank of Kenya Ltd be ordered to pay the amount it holding on behalf of the defendant in account no. 0110070011300. A garnishee nisi was issued by the court on 8th October 2008. The matter came for hearing on 16th October 2008. On that date the garnishee had sworn an affidavit and stated therein that the funds held in that account had been the subject of police investigations because it is alleged that it belongs to Mununga Tea Factory. On that basis the Garnishee requested the court to allow that tea factory to come before court with a view to informing the court their claim over the said money. Although the plaintiff was of the view that orders should be granted the court needs to consider the mischief addressed by order XXII. The principle behind that order is that the garnishee should be holding funds on behalf of the judgment debtor which the judgment creditor would be entitled to claim. Paragraph 13 of the Garnishee’s replying affidavit clearly shows that there is a claim made by Mununga tea factory over the funds held by the garnishee on behalf of the judgment debtor. I am of the view that the interest of justice require that Mununga Tea Factory be given an opportunity to come before court to inform the court of the claim if any they have over the judgment debtors money. For that reason the court will reserve the delivery of the ruling in respect of the application dated 8th October 2008. The court orders the Deputy Registrar of this court do serve a notice upon Mununga Tea Factory requesting them to file an affidavit explaining their claim if any over the judgement debtors funds held in account no. 0110070011300. This matter shall be mentioned on 2nd December 2008 with a view to the court giving a date for final ruling over the application dated 8th October 2008. Mununga Tea Factory should be informed of that date by the Deputy Registrar. In the meanwhile the court directs that a Garnishee nisi do issue in respect of account No. 0110070011300 until further orders of this court.
DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2008
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE