[2022] KEELC 2598 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 2598 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was not aware of the adverse ruling delivered on 6/5/2022 and only became aware after the time for filing a notice of appeal had lapsed. The applicant acted promptly upon learning of the ruling and filed the notice of appeal. The court was satisfied that sufficient cause had been...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 2598 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Samuel Odongo Anyanga; Respondent: Winnie Achieng Oyuga
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 69 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay and Extension of Time
Outcome
Application partly allowed.
Judges
A Ombwayo
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Stay of Execution, Notice of Appeal, Service of Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time Stay of Execution Notice of Appeal Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samuel Odongo Anyanga

Appellant

Winnie Achieng Oyuga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay and Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file and serve a notice of appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the notice of appeal already filed should be deemed properly filed and on record.
  3. 3 Whether a stay of execution pending appeal should be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was not aware of the adverse ruling delivered on 6/5/2022 and only became aware after the time for filing a notice of appeal had lapsed. The applicant acted promptly upon learning of the ruling and filed the notice of appeal. The court was satisfied that sufficient cause had been shown to warrant granting leave to file and serve the notice of appeal out of time, and deemed the notice of appeal already on record as properly filed. However, the court declined to grant a stay of execution pending appeal, holding that to do so would amount to a review of the earlier ruling, which is not permissible at this stage.

Court Disposition

Application partly allowed.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to file and serve notice of appeal out of time challenging the ruling dated 6/5/2022.
  • The notice of appeal on record is deemed as duly filed and on record.