[2022] KECA 676 (KLR)

[2022] KECA 676 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's advocate was not notified of the rescheduled date for delivery of the ruling and only became aware of the ruling after receiving a notice of taxation. The delay in filing the notice and record of appeal was approximately seven days, which the court considered not inordinate. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KECA 676 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Richard Ochieng Anyiko; Respondent: Kennedy Oyugi Obeti; Respondent: Caroline Atieno
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application E041 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Leave to File and Serve Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
M Ngugi
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Court of Appeal Rules, Delay and Excuse, Notice of Appeal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Process Court of Appeal Rules Delay and Excuse Notice of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Ochieng Anyiko

Applicant

Kennedy Oyugi Obeti

Respondent

Caroline Atieno

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Leave to File and Serve Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason for the delay in filing the notice and record of appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in filing the notice and record of appeal is inordinate and excusable.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file and serve the notice and record of appeal out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's advocate was not notified of the rescheduled date for delivery of the ruling and only became aware of the ruling after receiving a notice of taxation. The delay in filing the notice and record of appeal was approximately seven days, which the court considered not inordinate. The absence of a response from the respondents meant the applicant's explanation was uncontroverted. Applying the principles from Leo Sila Mutiso v Rose Hellen Wangari Mwangi, the court held that the reasons for the delay were excusable and that the application was merited. Consequently, the applicant was granted leave to file and serve the notice and record of appeal out of time.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to file a notice and record of appeal out of time.
  • The notice of appeal shall be filed and served within 7 days of the ruling.