[2021] KEELC 4740 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 4740 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated ownership of the suit property and that the respondent was in unlawful occupation. The applicant had complied with all statutory requirements for eviction under the Land Act, 2012, including proper service of notice. The respondent failed to file any response or...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 4740 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Louise Nyamisa Anyona; Respondent: Daniel Gathihi Njenga
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nyahururu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case 02 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Eviction Application
Outcome
application allowed in full
Judges
YM Angima
Legal Topics
Eviction Proceedings, Trespass to Land, Land Ownership, Statutory Eviction Notices
Source Language
en
Land and Property Eviction Proceedings Trespass to Land Land Ownership Statutory Eviction Notices

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Louise Nyamisa Anyona

Applicant

Daniel Gathihi Njenga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Eviction Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an order of eviction against the respondent from parcel Nyandarua/Olkalou Salient/539.
  2. 2 Whether the statutory requirements for eviction under the Land Act, 2012 were satisfied.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent was lawfully occupying the suit property.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated ownership of the suit property and that the respondent was in unlawful occupation. The applicant had complied with all statutory requirements for eviction under the Land Act, 2012, including proper service of notice. The respondent failed to file any response or submissions, and there was no evidence to justify his continued occupation. The court was satisfied that the applicant was entitled to the orders sought and granted all the prayers in the application, including eviction, appointment of a bailiff or auctioneer, provision of police security during eviction, a permanent injunction restraining the respondent from re-entering or...

Court Disposition

application allowed in full

Orders

  • The respondent shall be evicted from parcel Nyandarua/Olkalou Salient/539.
  • The applicant is at liberty to appoint a court bailiff or auctioneer to effect the eviction.