[1987] KEHC 18 (KLR)

[1987] KEHC 18 (KLR)

The court found that the paramount consideration in determining custody is the welfare of the children, as mandated by section 17 of the Guardianship of Infants Act, Cap 144. The evidence showed that the mother had always cared for the children during the father’s prolonged absences, was gainfully employed, and had adequate accommodation. The father, on the other hand, had no home or job in Kenya, intended to leave the children with his elderly mother and brother, and had little direct involvement in their upbringing. The court rejected the father’s allegations of immorality against the mother as unsubstantiated. The court concluded that the mother was better suited to provide for the...

Citation
[1987] KEHC 18 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: A. O; Respondent: K. A
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Judgment Date
15 October 1987
Case Number
Civil Case 3144 of 1987
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Ruling
Outcome
Custody of all four children granted to the mother; father’s application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Child Custody, Guardianship of Infants, Parental Rights, Welfare of Children
Source Language
English
Family and Children Child Custody Guardianship of Infants Parental Rights Welfare of Children

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A. O

Applicant

K. A

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons / Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether custody of the four minor children should be granted to the applicant father or the respondent mother.
  2. 2 Whether the welfare of the children is the paramount consideration in determining custody under the Guardianship of Infants Act, Cap 144.
  3. 3 Whether the conduct and circumstances of the parents affect the custody determination.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the paramount consideration in determining custody is the welfare of the children, as mandated by section 17 of the Guardianship of Infants Act, Cap 144. The evidence showed that the mother had always cared for the children during the father’s prolonged absences, was gainfully employed, and had adequate accommodation. The father, on the other hand, had no home or job in Kenya, intended to leave the children with his elderly mother and brother, and had little direct involvement in their upbringing. The court rejected the father’s allegations of immorality against the mother as unsubstantiated. The court concluded that the mother was better suited to provide for the...

Court Disposition

Custody of all four children granted to the mother; father’s application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Custody of all four children of the marriage is granted to the mother.
  • The father’s application for custody is dismissed with costs.