[2025] KEELC 5339 (KLR)
The court found that the issues raised by both parties regarding adverse possession, ownership, and occupation of the suit land are contested and require full hearing and evidence. The court declined to make a finding on the merits of the application for interim orders at this stage. Instead, it ordered that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEELC 5339 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mary Atieno Apondo; Plaintiff: Tobias Omondi Opondo; Plaintiff: John Asis Opondo; Plaintiff: Benard Juma Opondo; Defendant: Peter Achacha Opondo
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Migori
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E013 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Inhibition
- Outcome
- Status quo order granted; no finding on merits; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- MN Kullow
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Limitation of Actions, Injunctive Relief, Status Quo Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Atieno Apondo
Plaintiff
Tobias Omondi Opondo
Plaintiff
John Asis Opondo
Plaintiff
Benard Juma Opondo
Plaintiff
Peter Achacha Opondo
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Inhibition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have established a prima facie case for an order of inhibition and temporary injunction over LR. No. Kamagambo/Manyamba/652 pending hearing and determination of the suit.
- 2 Whether the applicants have demonstrated continuous and exclusive possession of the suit land for the requisite statutory period to warrant interim protection.
- 3 Whether the balance of convenience and risk of irreparable harm justify the grant of interim orders.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the issues raised by both parties regarding adverse possession, ownership, and occupation of the suit land are contested and require full hearing and evidence. The court declined to make a finding on the merits of the application for interim orders at this stage. Instead, it ordered that the status quo as at the date of filing the application be maintained to preserve the subject matter pending hearing and determination of the suit. No orders as to costs were made. The court emphasized that the substantive issues of adverse possession and entitlement to the land can only be determined after hearing evidence from both sides.
Court Disposition
Status quo order granted; no finding on merits; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The parties shall maintain the status quo obtaining at the filing of the application.
- The suit shall be set down for hearing on a priority basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
Apondo & 3 others v Opondo (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E013 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 5339 (KLR) (17 March 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 5339 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Migori
Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E013 of 2023
MN Kullow, J
March 17, 2025
IN THE MATTER OF LIMITATION OF ACTIONS ACT, CAP 22 LAWS OF KENYA IN THE MATTER OF CLAIM FOR ADVERSE POSSESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION 38 OF THE LIMITATION OF ACTIONS ACT AND IN THE MATTER OF LR. NO. KAMAGAMBO/MANYAMBA/652
Between
Mary Atieno Apondo
1st Plaintiff
Tobias Omondi Opondo
2nd Plaintiff
John Asis Opondo
3rd Plaintiff
Benard Juma Opondo
4th Plaintiff
and
Peter Achacha Opondo
Defendant
Ruling
1. By Notice of Motion dated 27/6/2023, the Applicant sought the following orders:-i.Spentii.An order of inhibiting the restrictions of any transfer, lease, or any other instrument whatsoever in respect of LR. No. Kamagambo/Manyamaba /652 pending the hearing and determination of the suit.iii.That the court do issue a temporary order of injunction against the Respondent and/or his agents from trespassing, building, fencing, excavating, cultivation, demolishing and/or erecting structures on the suit land.
2. The Application was based on the ground that the Applicant has been in adverse possession of the suit land for a period of over 12 years and that he took possession of 0. 8 hectares in the year 1978.
3. The Applicant further states her late husband is buried on the said land and that the suit land is at the risk of being transferred/or to the detriment of the Applicant.
4. The Applicant in support of the above stated grounds have deponed in the Supporting Affidavit dated 27/6/2023 and annexed to the said Affidavit are various documents in support of the agreements contained herein and photos of houses, Title Deed, certificate of official search.
5. The application was opposed by the Respondent by way of a Replying Affidavit sworn on 13/7/2023. The respondent contends that he is the absolute registered owner of Land Parcel Kamagambo/Manyamba /652 and that he bought the said land from one Odondo Omwano and has subsequently settled his parents and siblings on the land.
6. He further stated that the 1st Applicant indeed co-habited with his late father and that the children listed as the Supporting Affidavit were not sired by his late father.
7. He took issue with the Applicant’s assertion that she took possession and has been continually in occupation of the land. He states that the Applicant is claiming a beneficiary interest and later made a claim of adverse possession.
8. I have considered the Application herein and Replying Affidavit in opposition to the same and the submissions filed by the parties and it is my considered view that the matter raised by the parties can only be ventilated at a full hearing where evidence has to be adduced on the contested issues raised and in the circumstances, I make no finding on the merit of Application but order that the parties do maintain the status quo obtaining at the filing of the Application and suit be set down for hearing on priority basis.
9. I will also issue no orders as to costs.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025. ....................MOHAMMED N. KULLOWJUDGEIn the presence of:Vincent Court AssistantMs. Aoleon Abisai For the PlaintiffNo Appearance for the Defendant