[2024] KEELC 14086 (KLR)
The court found that the suit land in question was not part of the estate of the deceased at the time of his death, as it had already been subdivided prior to his demise. Both the applicant and the Land Registrar confirmed this position in their defences in the lower court. Consequently, the matter was not a...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 14086 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Eunice Kemunto Arita; Respondent: Stephen Kinanga Ndubi; Respondent: Land Registrar, Nyamira County
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nyamira
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E012 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Application for Stay and Setting Aside of Lower Court Judgment
- Outcome
- The court held that it has jurisdiction to hear the application and will proceed to consider it on its merits.
- Judges
- JM Kamau
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Elc, Limitation of Actions, Setting Aside Judgment, Succession and Land, Stay of Execution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eunice Kemunto Arita
Applicant
Stephen Kinanga Ndubi
Respondent
Land Registrar, Nyamira County
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Application for Stay and Setting Aside of Lower Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Environment and Land Court has jurisdiction over the matter given the succession issues raised.
- 2 Whether the suit in the lower court was time-barred under the Limitation of Actions Act.
- 3 Whether the lower court proceedings and judgment were proper and lawful.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the suit land in question was not part of the estate of the deceased at the time of his death, as it had already been subdivided prior to his demise. Both the applicant and the Land Registrar confirmed this position in their defences in the lower court. Consequently, the matter was not a succession dispute but a land dispute, thus falling within the jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court. The court, having perused the lower court file and satisfied itself on the nature of the dispute, held that it was amenable to hear the applicant's application on its merits. The ruling did not conclusively determine the application for stay or setting aside but established...
Court Disposition
The court held that it has jurisdiction to hear the application and will proceed to consider it on its merits.
Orders
- The Environment and Land Court is amenable to hear the applicant's application.
- The matter will proceed for hearing on the substantive application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
Arita v Ndubi & another (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E012 of 2024) [2024] KEELC 14086 (KLR) (11 December 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 14086 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Nyamira
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E012 of 2024
JM Kamau, J
December 11, 2024
Between
Eunice Kemunto Arita
Applicant
and
Stephen Kinanga Ndubi
1st Respondent
Land Registrar, Nyamira County
2nd Respondent
Ruling
1. Eunice Kemunto Arita moved this Court vide a Miscellaneous Civil Application ELC No.E012 of 2024 against one Stephen Kinanga Ndubi and Land Registrar, Nyamira under certificate of urgency seeking for Orders that this Court calls for the file in Nyamira Chief Magistrate’s Court ELC No.E002 of 2020 to ascertain the legality, correctness and propriety of the proceedings thereon, stay of execution of the Decree of 25/10/2023 by the said Court and for the setting aside of the Judgment and all the consequential orders. By doing so, the Court was requested to invoke its inherent powers. The Grounds upon which this Court was moved were that the suit in the lower court was statutorily time barred under the Limitation of Actions Act, 2015, one of a revoked and annulled Grant to found the case, that the 1st Respondent lacked locus to institute the suit, the subordinate Court lacked jurisdiction, it was a mistrial and that the 1st Respondent would suffer no prejudice if the sought for orders are granted. Before putting pen to paper and proceed with the Application before me, and after issues of Succession were raised I called for the lower court file in order to ascertain whether the same is a succession matter in which case this court has no jurisdiction, a purely ELC matter where this Court has jurisdiction or even a hybrid in which case the predominant issue(s) would determine the Court that has jurisdiction. The same was availed to me on 28/10/2024 and I have had the opportunity to peruse the file.
2. The Plaintiff Stephen Kinanga Ndubi suing as the legal representative of the Estate of Hezron Ndubi Ochenge (Deceased) filed suit on 29/9/2020 against one Eunice Kemunto Arita, Samwel Momanyi Ogechi and the Land Registrar, Nyamira County. The prayers therein are for:-a.A Declaration that the sub-division of parcel No. L.R. North Mugirango/Boisanga/2516 was illegal, null and void.b.Cancellation of the same and reversion to the original numberc.Eviction of the first 2 Defendants.d.Injunction against their re-entry on the suit land.
3. In his Statement of Defence, dated 26/10/2020 the 2nd Defendant in the lower court averred that the said land North Mugirango/Boisanga/2516 was not part of the estate of the late Hezron Ndubi Ochenge as at the time of his death in 2012 since it had already been sub-divided way back in 2009 giving rise to North Mugirango/Boisanga/4598, 4599 and 4600 respectively. The 1st Defendant in the lower court who is the Applicant herein in his Defence dated 2/4/2022 admits that the suit land is not part of an Estate. This court is therefore amenable to Hearing the Applicant.
RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NYAMIRA THIS 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024. MUGO KAMAUJUDGEIn the Presence of: -Court Assistant: BrendaApplicant’s Counsel: N/ADefendants’ Counsel: N/A