[2021] KEHC 7991 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 7991 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had not provided sufficient evidence of the process employed by the respondent or of the decision regarding the judgment date to support his claim of being denied a hearing. Additionally, the court held that the applicant must address the issue of exhaustion of statutory remedies...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 7991 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: ARR; Respondent: The Kadhi's Court at Upper Hill Nairobi; Interested Party: UI
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review Application E017 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave and Directions
Outcome
Directions issued for inter partes hearing; no final determination on leave or stay at this stage.
Judges
P Nyamweya
Legal Topics
Judicial Review Procedure, Right to Be Heard, Exhaustion of Remedies, Divorce Petitions
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Family and Children Judicial Review Procedure Right to Be Heard Exhaustion of Remedies Divorce Petitions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ARR

Applicant

The Kadhi's Court at Upper Hill Nairobi

Respondent

UI

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Ruling on Leave and Directions

  1. 1 Whether the applicant was denied the right to be heard in Divorce Petition KCDC 96 of 2020.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient evidence of the alleged denial and the process employed by the respondent.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is required to exhaust available statutory remedies before seeking judicial review.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had not provided sufficient evidence of the process employed by the respondent or of the decision regarding the judgment date to support his claim of being denied a hearing. Additionally, the court held that the applicant must address the issue of exhaustion of statutory remedies before seeking judicial review. Consequently, the court directed that the application for leave and stay be canvassed inter partes, and issued directions for the filing and service of further affidavits and submissions by all parties. The matter was set down for hearing, with all pleadings and submissions to be filed electronically in compliance with COVID-19 protocols.

Court Disposition

Directions issued for inter partes hearing; no final determination on leave or stay at this stage.

Orders

  • The applicant to file a supplementary affidavit annexing certified proceedings within 30 days.
  • The applicant to serve the respondent and interested party with the application, submissions, supplementary affidavit, ruling, and mention notice within 30 days.