[2025] KEHC 10207 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 10207 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant, Assets Recovery Agency, had established reasonable grounds to believe that the respondent's motor vehicle KDP 137N was used in the commission of an offence involving trafficking in narcotic drugs and that it may have been acquired using proceeds of crime. The evidence included the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 10207 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Assets Recovery Agency; Respondent: Vincent Odhiambo Nyadero; Interested Party: Car House Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Anti-corruption and Economic Crimes Miscellaneous E029 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Anti Corruption and Economic Crimes Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Originating Motion for Preservation Orders
Outcome
Application allowed. Preservation orders granted as prayed in prayers (2), (3), (4), and (5) of the application.
Judges
LM Njuguna
Legal Topics
Proceeds of Crime, Asset Preservation Orders, Money Laundering, Drug Trafficking
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Proceeds of Crime Asset Preservation Orders Money Laundering Drug Trafficking

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Assets Recovery Agency

Applicant

Vincent Odhiambo Nyadero

Respondent

Car House Limited

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Anti Corruption and Economic Crimes Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Originating Motion for Preservation Orders

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has established reasonable grounds for the issuance of preservation orders over motor vehicle KDP 137N.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's motor vehicle is suspected to be proceeds of crime or used in the commission of an offence under the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant, Assets Recovery Agency, had established reasonable grounds to believe that the respondent's motor vehicle KDP 137N was used in the commission of an offence involving trafficking in narcotic drugs and that it may have been acquired using proceeds of crime. The evidence included the recovery of the vehicle with suspected narcotics, the arrest of an individual in possession of the vehicle, and the financial relationship between the respondent and the arrested individual. The court was satisfied that these facts met the threshold for granting preservation orders under Sections 81 and 82 of the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2019....

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Preservation orders granted as prayed in prayers (2), (3), (4), and (5) of the application.

Orders

  • Preservation order issued prohibiting the respondent, interested party, their employees, agents, servants, or any persons acting on their behalf from selling, transferring, disposing of, or dealing in any manner with motor vehicle registration number KDP 137N Toyota Mark X Chassis Number GRX130-6103945.
  • Further orders as set out in prayers (3), (4), and (5) of the application granted.