[2025] KEHC 10163 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 10163 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had established reasonable grounds to believe that the assets in question were proceeds of crime, specifically from narcotics trafficking, based on the evidence of financial transactions, ownership records, and links to individuals charged with drug offences. The court was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 10163 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Assets Recovery Agency; Respondent: Irene Auma Odero; Respondent: David Otieno Maira; Interested Party: Motorology Limited; Interested Party: Masudi Suleiman Nchidziru
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Anti-corruption and Economic Crimes Miscellaneous E030 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Originating Motion for Preservation Orders
Outcome
application allowed; preservation orders granted
Judges
LM Njuguna
Legal Topics
Proceeds of Crime, Asset Preservation Orders, Money Laundering, Narcotics Trafficking, Forfeiture Proceedings, Interlocutory Applications
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Administrative Law Proceeds of Crime Asset Preservation Orders Money Laundering Narcotics Trafficking Forfeiture Proceedings +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Assets Recovery Agency

Applicant

Irene Auma Odero

Respondent

David Otieno Maira

Respondent

Motorology Limited

Interested Party

Masudi Suleiman Nchidziru

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Originating Motion for Preservation Orders

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has established reasonable grounds for the grant of preservation orders over the specified assets under the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act.
  2. 2 Whether the assets in question are proceeds of crime linked to narcotics trafficking.
  3. 3 Whether the respondents and interested parties are beneficial owners of the assets subject to preservation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had established reasonable grounds to believe that the assets in question were proceeds of crime, specifically from narcotics trafficking, based on the evidence of financial transactions, ownership records, and links to individuals charged with drug offences. The court was satisfied that the threshold for granting preservation orders under the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act had been met. The absence of opposition from the respondents further supported the applicant's case. Accordingly, the court allowed the application and granted the preservation orders as sought in the specified prayers.

Court Disposition

application allowed; preservation orders granted

Orders

  • Preservation orders are hereby issued in respect of motor vehicle registration numbers KDJ 890X and KDR 697W.
  • Preservation order is issued in respect of land parcel known as Kwale/Ukunda S.S/2544.