[2022] KECA 507 (KLR)

[2022] KECA 507 (KLR)

The court determined that the order should be settled in terms of the draft prepared and forwarded by the appellant's advocates, as there was no objection or alternative draft from the respondents. The court thus directed that the order be settled as per the draft submitted to the Deputy Registrar by the firm of A....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KECA 507 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Jemimah Caleb Atieno; Respondent: Mary Ang’awa; Respondent: Charles Ang’awa
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 3 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Order on Appeal
Outcome
Order settled in terms of the draft prepared and forwarded by the appellant's advocates.
Judges
M Ngugi
Legal Topics
Appeal Orders, Settlement of Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeal Orders Settlement of Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jemimah Caleb Atieno

Appellant

Mary Ang’awa

Respondent

Charles Ang’awa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Order on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the order should be settled in terms of the draft prepared by the appellant's advocates.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the order should be settled in terms of the draft prepared and forwarded by the appellant's advocates, as there was no objection or alternative draft from the respondents. The court thus directed that the order be settled as per the draft submitted to the Deputy Registrar by the firm of A. H. Malik & Co. Advocates through their letter dated 3rd September, 2019.

Court Disposition

Order settled in terms of the draft prepared and forwarded by the appellant's advocates.

Orders

  • The order is settled in terms of the order prepared and forwarded to the Deputy Registrar of this Court by the firm of A. H. Malik & Co. Advocates through a letter dated 3rd September, 2019.