[2017] KEELC 3393 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 3393 (KLR)

The court found that although the 2nd respondent was not the subject of any specific orders in the petition, he had nonetheless participated in the proceedings by filing a response. The petitioner's counsel made an oral application to withdraw the petition, which the court allowed. In exercising its discretion, the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 3393 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Augustine Guya Orire; Respondent: Chairman of Nyando Land Control Board; Respondent: John Odoyo Atieno; Respondent: District Land Registrar, Nyando
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Constitutional Petition 1 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Withdrawal of Petition Before Hearing
Outcome
Petition withdrawn with costs to the 2nd respondent.
Legal Topics
Land Control Board Powers, Withdrawal of Petition, Constitutional Right to Property
Source Language
en
Land and Property Constitutional Law Land Control Board Powers Withdrawal of Petition Constitutional Right to Property

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Augustine Guya Orire

Applicant

Chairman of Nyando Land Control Board

Respondent

John Odoyo Atieno

Respondent

District Land Registrar, Nyando

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Withdrawal of Petition Before Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the constitutional petition as requested.
  2. 2 Whether the 2nd respondent is entitled to costs upon withdrawal of the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although the 2nd respondent was not the subject of any specific orders in the petition, he had nonetheless participated in the proceedings by filing a response. The petitioner's counsel made an oral application to withdraw the petition, which the court allowed. In exercising its discretion, the court held that the 2nd respondent was entitled to costs due to his involvement in the matter. The petition and the notice of motion were accordingly marked as withdrawn with costs to the 2nd respondent.

Court Disposition

Petition withdrawn with costs to the 2nd respondent.

Orders

  • The petition dated 16th July 2014 and the notice of motion of even date are marked as withdrawn.
  • Costs awarded to the 2nd respondent.