[2023] KEELRC 1478 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 1478 (KLR)

The court found that although the respondent claimed the claimant was a casual employee, the admission that his daily wage was accumulated and paid monthly, and that he worked continuously, meant he was protected under the Employment Act as a regular employee. The respondent failed to produce employment records to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1478 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Christopher Ogega Auka; Respondent: Manji Foods Industries Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Employment and Labour Relations Cause 353 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim partly allowed; terminal dues awarded; no compensation for unfair termination; each party to bear own costs.
Judges
M Mbarũ
Legal Topics
Summary Dismissal, Casual Vs Permanent Employment, Underpayment of Wages, Entitlement to Terminal Dues, Annual Leave Entitlement
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Summary Dismissal Casual Vs Permanent Employment Underpayment of Wages Entitlement to Terminal Dues Annual Leave Entitlement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Christopher Ogega Auka

Applicant

Manji Foods Industries Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was a casual or permanent employee entitled to statutory protections.
  2. 2 Whether the summary dismissal of the claimant was unfair and in violation of the Employment Act.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant was underpaid in relation to the statutory minimum wage.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although the respondent claimed the claimant was a casual employee, the admission that his daily wage was accumulated and paid monthly, and that he worked continuously, meant he was protected under the Employment Act as a regular employee. The respondent failed to produce employment records to disprove the claimant's assertions regarding his entitlements. The court determined the claimant was underpaid relative to the statutory minimum wage, was entitled to prorated leave pay, house allowance, and unpaid salary for September 2017. However, due to the claimant's gross misconduct in causing an accident that resulted in loss to the employer, compensation for unfair...

Court Disposition

Claim partly allowed; terminal dues awarded; no compensation for unfair termination; each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant Kshs 12,213 for September 2017 wages.
  • Respondent to pay claimant Kshs 4,275 as prorated leave pay.