[2011] KEHC 1445 (KLR)
The court found that the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee acted without jurisdiction when it purported to overturn the decision of the Nanyuki Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court, which had already adopted the Divisional Land Disputes Tribunal’s award. The court held that once a tribunal’s decision is...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 1445 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Austine Kihara Warema; Respondent: George Gituku Nyamu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 108 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Land Boundary Disputes, Jurisdiction of Tribunals, Res Judicata, Amendment of Registry Index Map
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Austine Kihara Warema
Appellant
George Gituku Nyamu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee had jurisdiction to overturn a judgment already adopted by the magistrate's court.
- 2 Whether the tribunal had jurisdiction to order the amendment of the Registry Index Map (RIM).
- 3 Whether the matter was res judicata.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee acted without jurisdiction when it purported to overturn the decision of the Nanyuki Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court, which had already adopted the Divisional Land Disputes Tribunal’s award. The court held that once a tribunal’s decision is adopted as a judgment of the court, any subsequent appeal to the tribunal is incompetent and any decision arising therefrom is a nullity. Furthermore, the tribunal lacked the legal authority to order the amendment of the Registry Index Map (RIM), as such jurisdiction is reserved for the Land Registrar, the High Court, or, in certain cases, the subordinate court. The court...
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The decision of the Rift Valley Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Tribunal is set aside.
- The decree of the Nanyuki Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court (Award Case No. 31 of 2007) is restored and should be executed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLICOF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NYERI
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 108 OF 2008
AUSTINE KIHARA WAREMA………….......................………….. APPELLANT
VERSUS
GEORGE GITUKU NYAMU……………..........................………. RESPONDENT
(Appeal arising from the decision of Laikipia Lands Disputes Appeal Tribunal case Appeal No. 89 of 2007 dated 14th October 2008)
JUDGMENT
On 14th October 2008, the Rift Valley Province Land Disputes Appeal Committee delivered its judgment which in effect directed the Laikipia District Land Registrar to amend the Registry Index Map (RIM) to conform to the present boundary margin as on the ground. Austine Kihara Warema, the Appellant was dissatisfied hence this appeal. On appeal the Appellant put forward the following grounds in his Memorandum of Appeal.
That the appeals tribunal erred in law in purporting to sit on appeal against a judgment of the court vide Nanyuki SPMCaward case no. 31 of 2007, a mater clearly re-judicata.
That the appeals tribunal erred in law in purporting to order amendment of registry index map R.I.M. a jurisdiction not vested in the tribunal but only the high court under cap. 300 laws of Kenya.
That the appeals tribunal erred in law in adjudicating on a matter outside its jurisdiction.
When the appeal came up for hearing, George Gituku Nyamu the Respondent herein and his counsel failed to turn up despite having been served with a hearing notice hence the appeal proceeded for hearing exparte. The recorded evidence shows that the Appellant and the Respondent own parcels of land which are adjacent to each other within Gatarakwa scheme. The Respondent filed a complaint before the Laikipia Land Disputes Tribunal claiming that his land was less by 1 acre. He complained that his land was within the parcel of land owned by the Appellant. He sought for the intervention of the Land Disputes Tribunal to order for the determination of the boundaries between the two parcels of land. The Land Disputes Tribunal considered the complaint and came to the conclusion that the boundary between L.R. no. Euasonyiro/Suguroi Block VI/168 and Euasonyiro/Suguroi Block VI/5 should remain as it is. The Respondent was dissatisfied with the land Disputes Tribunal. He then preferred an appeal to the Rift Valley Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Committee. He succeeded on appeal. The appeal was aggrieved hence this appeal. The Provincial land Disputes Appeal’s tribunal ordered the boundary to remain the same and directed the registry Index Map (RIM) to be amended to reflect the ground occupation. Meanwhile the Divisional Land Disputes Tribunal was adopted as the judgment of the Nanyuki Senior Principal Magistrate’s court on 28th September 2007. The appeal before the Provincial Land Disputes Appeals committee was filed on 8th October 2007. by that time the Divisional Land Disputes Tribunal’s decision had been adopted. On appeal the Appellant argued that the decision of the Provincial Appeals Committee did not have jurisdiction to overturn the adoptive decision. With respect I agree with the Appellant’s submission that the Appeals Committee acted beyond jurisdiction when it purported to overturn the adoptive order. The Appeal’s Committee’s decision must be overturned.
The second ground argued on appeal related to the Appeal tribunal’s decision to order the Land Registrar to amend the R.I.M. with respect, I agree with the Appellant that tribunal had no jurisdiction to order for the amendment o the Registry Index Map. That power is the preserve of the Land Registrar, this court and in certain case the subordinate court.
In the end I am convinced the Appeal should be allowed which I hereby direct for the avoidance of doubt. The decision of the Rift Valley Provincial Land Disputes Appeals Tribunal is set aside with costs. The decree of the Nanyuki Senior Principal Magistrate’s court i.e Award case no. 31 of 2007 is restored hence the same should be executed.
Dated and delivered this 29th day of July 2011.
J.K. SERGON
JUDGE
In open court in the presence of Karweru for the appellant N/A for Njuguna for Respondent.
J.K. SERGON
JUDGE