[2024] KEELRC 46 (KLR)

[2024] KEELRC 46 (KLR)

The court held that it was not seized of the cause (Misc. Cause No E052 of 2022) pursuant to which the security deposit was made, and therefore lacked jurisdiction to order the release of the funds in the present appeal. The proper procedure is for the Respondent/Applicant to file an application for release of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELRC 46 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Auto Continental Limited; Respondent: Frankline Ngala Chome
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Appeal E053 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Post Appeal Application for Release of Security Deposit
Outcome
application struck off
Judges
AK Nzei
Legal Topics
Release of Security, Execution of Judgment, Post Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Release of Security Execution of Judgment Post Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Auto Continental Limited

Appellant

Frankline Ngala Chome

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Post Appeal Application for Release of Security Deposit

  1. 1 Whether the Employment and Labour Relations Court at this appellate stage has jurisdiction to order release of funds deposited as security in a different miscellaneous cause.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent/Applicant is entitled to the release of the deposited security following dismissal of the appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the application for release of funds should be made in the cause under which the deposit was ordered.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that it was not seized of the cause (Misc. Cause No E052 of 2022) pursuant to which the security deposit was made, and therefore lacked jurisdiction to order the release of the funds in the present appeal. The proper procedure is for the Respondent/Applicant to file an application for release of the funds in the miscellaneous cause under which the deposit was ordered, so that the court with jurisdiction over that matter can determine the application. As a result, the application for release of the funds in the appeal was struck off with no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

application struck off

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 8/9/2023 is struck off with no order as to costs.
  • The Respondent/Applicant is directed to file a similar application for release of the funds in Misc. Cause No E052 of 2022 for determination by the court seized of that matter.