[2021] KEHC 1002 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 1002 (KLR)

The court found that there were no orders of taxation or certificates of taxation on record, and no warrants of attachment or sale had been issued. Therefore, there was nothing capable of execution, and no urgency was demonstrated to justify hearing the applications during the court recess. The applications were not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 1002 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Auto Selection (K) Limited; Respondent: Edmond Shiundu Alele; Respondent: Peter Njoroge Nganga
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 41 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Stay of Execution and Certification of Urgency During Recess
Outcome
applications declined; files returned to Bungoma High Court; matter closed at Siaya High Court
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Taxation of Costs, Certification of Urgency
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Taxation of Costs Certification of Urgency

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Auto Selection (K) Limited

Appellant

Edmond Shiundu Alele

Respondent

Peter Njoroge Nganga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Stay of Execution and Certification of Urgency During Recess

  1. 1 Whether there are executable orders or certificates of taxation to warrant stay of execution.
  2. 2 Whether the applications demonstrate sufficient urgency to be heard during the court recess.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there were no orders of taxation or certificates of taxation on record, and no warrants of attachment or sale had been issued. Therefore, there was nothing capable of execution, and no urgency was demonstrated to justify hearing the applications during the court recess. The applications were not supported by material evidence to warrant consideration under certificates of urgency. The files were returned to the Bungoma High Court for further management, and the matter was closed at Siaya High Court.

Court Disposition

applications declined; files returned to Bungoma High Court; matter closed at Siaya High Court

Orders

  • Applications for stay of execution and certification of urgency declined.
  • Files returned to Bungoma High Court for further management.