https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/10856
The preliminary objection failed because the court was not persuaded that section 10 of the Arbitration Act deprived it of jurisdiction to issue interim orders in arbitral proceedings, and the remaining grounds were factual in nature and therefore unsuitable for determination as a preliminary objection.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 10856 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Automated Entrance Systems; Defendant: Trade Mark Africa & Others; Interested Party: Interested Party
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application Arbitration E002 of 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application Arbitration / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Preliminary objection dismissed.
- Judges
- ["BK Njoroge"]
- Legal Topics
- Preliminary Objection, Jurisdiction of the High Court, Interim Preservation Orders, Arbitral Proceedings, Section 10 of the Arbitration Act
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Automated Entrance Systems
Plaintiff
Trade Mark Africa & Others
Defendant
Interested Party
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application Arbitration / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court lacked jurisdiction to grant interim preservation orders in arbitral proceedings under section 10 of the Arbitration Act.
- 2 Whether the preliminary objection raised pure points of law or contested factual issues.
Ratio Decidendi
The preliminary objection failed because the court was not persuaded that section 10 of the Arbitration Act deprived it of jurisdiction to issue interim orders in arbitral proceedings, and the remaining grounds were factual in nature and therefore unsuitable for determination as a preliminary objection.
Court Disposition
Preliminary objection dismissed.
Orders
- The Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 15.7.2026 is overruled and dismissed for lack of merit.
- The parties shall proceed to argue the Notice of Motion dated 10.7.2026 orally.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Automated Entrance Systems v Trade Mark Africa & others (Miscellaneous Application Arbitration E002 of 2026) [2026] KEHC 10856 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (16 July 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 10856 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts) Commercial and Tax Miscellaneous Application Arbitration E002 of 2026 BK Njoroge, J July 16, 2026 Between Automated Entrance Systems Plaintiff and Trade Mark Africa & Others Defendant Ruling 1.The Respondent has raised a Notice of Preliminary Objections dated 15.7.2026. It raises 7 grounds. 2.The Court has been informed that it lacks jurisdiction to grant an interim order of preservation. This is pursuant to Section 10 of the Arbitration Act. 3.The other grounds argued challenge the application by the Applicant. They raise factual matters that ought to be heard in response to the application. They are not pure points of law. 4.Miss Wanjiku, Counsel for the Interested Party, supports the preliminary objection. She submits that Section 10 of the Arbitration Act limits this Court. That the Court cannot be seen to be going against the Arbitral award. 5.Mr. Kimathi submits that the preliminary objection as pleaded raises factual issues and is based on contested facts. 6.This matter is pending before Hon. Justice Moses Ado. The Court will avoid saying a lot so as to avoid creeping into a matter already being handled by a brother judge. 7.The Court notes that Hon. Justice Ado had issued interim orders which were in place until they are said to have expired. 8.The Court is not convinced that the preliminary objection has demonstrated that this Court lacks jurisdiction to issue interim orders in arbitral proceedings. The Court is aware that it possesses powers to even stay Arbitral proceedings. 9.The rest of the arguments raised are factual and ought to be raised in the reply to the application. Determination 10.The Determination of this Court is as follows;1.The Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 15.7.2026 is overruled and dismissed for lack of merit.2.Let the parties proceed to argue the application by way of a Notice of Motion dated 10.7.2026 orally. 11.It is so ordered. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MILIMANI THIS 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2026.NJOROGE BENJAMIN K.JUDGEIn the presence of:Mr. Kimathi for Applicants.Mr. Okullo for Respondent.Miss Wanjiku for the Interested Party.John Paul - Court Assistant.