https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/10856

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/10856

The preliminary objection failed because the court was not persuaded that section 10 of the Arbitration Act deprived it of jurisdiction to issue interim orders in arbitral proceedings, and the remaining grounds were factual in nature and therefore unsuitable for determination as a preliminary objection.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 10856 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Automated Entrance Systems; Defendant: Trade Mark Africa & Others; Interested Party: Interested Party
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application Arbitration E002 of 2026
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application Arbitration / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
Preliminary objection dismissed.
Judges
["BK Njoroge"]
Legal Topics
Preliminary Objection, Jurisdiction of the High Court, Interim Preservation Orders, Arbitral Proceedings, Section 10 of the Arbitration Act
Source Language
en
Arbitration Law Commercial Law Civil Procedure Preliminary Objection Jurisdiction of the High Court Interim Preservation Orders Arbitral Proceedings Section 10 of the Arbitration Act

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Automated Entrance Systems

Plaintiff

Trade Mark Africa & Others

Defendant

Interested Party

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application Arbitration / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the High Court lacked jurisdiction to grant interim preservation orders in arbitral proceedings under section 10 of the Arbitration Act.
  2. 2 Whether the preliminary objection raised pure points of law or contested factual issues.

Ratio Decidendi

The preliminary objection failed because the court was not persuaded that section 10 of the Arbitration Act deprived it of jurisdiction to issue interim orders in arbitral proceedings, and the remaining grounds were factual in nature and therefore unsuitable for determination as a preliminary objection.

Court Disposition

Preliminary objection dismissed.

Orders

  • The Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 15.7.2026 is overruled and dismissed for lack of merit.
  • The parties shall proceed to argue the Notice of Motion dated 10.7.2026 orally.