https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/scc/2026/152

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/scc/2026/152

The Claimant proved the existence of a repair contract, the performance of repairs, and the outstanding debt through invoices, WhatsApp messages, and the Respondent’s admission that the vehicle was repaired and was still at the Claimant’s garage; the Respondent’s contrary documents were irrelevant. Because the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] SCC 152 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Carmex Automobile; Respondent: Arlingtone Evans
Court
Small Claims Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Commercial Case E279 of 2026
Procedural Posture
Commercial Claim and Counterclaim in the Small Claims Court / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment entered for the Claimant; counterclaim dismissed.
Judges
["TN Mwangeka"]
Legal Topics
Repair Services Contract, Breach of Contract, Counterclaim, Proof of Debt, Delivery and Retention of Motor Vehicle, Interest and Costs
Source Language
en
Contract Law Commercial Law Civil Procedure Repair Services Contract Breach of Contract Counterclaim Proof of Debt Delivery and Retention of Motor Vehicle +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Carmex Automobile

Claimant

Arlingtone Evans

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Claim and Counterclaim in the Small Claims Court / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant proved the claim for repair charges on a balance of probabilities.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent’s counterclaim for release of the motor vehicle in functional condition was merited.
  3. 3 Whether the Respondent was obliged to pay the claimed consideration before demanding return of the vehicle.

Ratio Decidendi

The Claimant proved the existence of a repair contract, the performance of repairs, and the outstanding debt through invoices, WhatsApp messages, and the Respondent’s admission that the vehicle was repaired and was still at the Claimant’s garage; the Respondent’s contrary documents were irrelevant. Because the Respondent had not paid the due consideration, the counterclaim for release of the vehicle failed and judgment issued for the Claimant.

Court Disposition

Judgment entered for the Claimant; counterclaim dismissed.

Orders

  • The Respondent shall pay the Claimant Kshs. 433,711.64.
  • Interest shall accrue at court rates from the date of judgment.