[2007] KEELRC 1 (KLR)

[2007] KEELRC 1 (KLR)

The court held that the right of appeal against the Minister's order must be grounded in express statutory provision or necessary implication. In the absence of such provision, the court found that the Union had no automatic right to appeal the Minister's decision. The preliminary objection raised by the respondent...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KEELRC 1 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Aviation & Allied Workers Union; Respondent: The Minister for Labour & Human Resource Development; Interested Party: Kenya Airways Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 1 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Ministerial Orders, Right of Appeal, Trade Union Disputes
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Ministerial Orders Right of Appeal Trade Union Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Aviation & Allied Workers Union

Appellant

The Minister for Labour & Human Resource Development

Respondent

Kenya Airways Ltd

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Minister for Labour & Human Resource Development acted lawfully in rejecting the Union's application.
  2. 2 Whether the Union had a right to appeal against the Minister's order.
  3. 3 Whether the preliminary objection raised by the respondent and supported by the interested party was valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the right of appeal against the Minister's order must be grounded in express statutory provision or necessary implication. In the absence of such provision, the court found that the Union had no automatic right to appeal the Minister's decision. The preliminary objection raised by the respondent and supported by the interested party was upheld, as the statutory framework governing employment and labour disputes did not provide for an appeal in the circumstances presented. The court emphasized that ministerial decisions are generally final unless there is a clear breach of law or procedure, which was not established in this case. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed...

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
  • No order as to costs.