[2025] KEELC 1079 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had sufficiently explained the delay in filing the notice of appeal by providing medical evidence of the lead applicant's indisposition. In the interest of justice and to safeguard the applicants' right to appeal, the court exercised its discretion to grant leave to file the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEELC 1079 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ojwang’ Boniface R Awino; Defendant: Nam Oduka; Defendant: Martin Owino Oduka; Defendant: Joseph Omulo Opil; Defendant: Philip Omolo Aida; Defendant: Omondi Okoth; Defendant: Tom Juma Kenye; Defendant: Martin Juma Nam
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 578 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
- Outcome
- application allowed with conditions
- Judges
- E Asati
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Execution, Notice of Appeal, Security for Costs, Eviction Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ojwang’ Boniface R Awino
Plaintiff
Nam Oduka
Defendant
Martin Owino Oduka
Defendant
Joseph Omulo Opil
Defendant
Philip Omolo Aida
Defendant
Omondi Okoth
Defendant
Tom Juma Kenye
Defendant
Martin Juma Nam
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay of Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to file a notice of appeal and memorandum of appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether the court should stay execution of the judgment pending appeal.
- 3 Whether the delay in filing the notice of appeal was sufficiently explained.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had sufficiently explained the delay in filing the notice of appeal by providing medical evidence of the lead applicant's indisposition. In the interest of justice and to safeguard the applicants' right to appeal, the court exercised its discretion to grant leave to file the notice of appeal out of time. The court also granted a stay of execution of the judgment, conditional upon the applicants depositing Kshs. 500,000 as security in a joint interest-earning account within 45 days. Failure to comply with this condition would result in the lapse of the stay order. The court awarded the costs of the application to the plaintiff/respondent.
Court Disposition
application allowed with conditions
Orders
- Leave is granted to the applicants to lodge a notice of appeal.
- The notice of appeal must be filed within 14 days of the ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
36 paragraphs
Awino v Oduka & 6 others (Environment & Land Case 578 of 2015) [2025] KEELC 1079 (KLR) (6 March 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 1079 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
Environment & Land Case 578 of 2015
E Asati, J
March 6, 2025
Between
Ojwang’ Boniface R Awino
Plaintiff
and
Nam Oduka
1st Defendant
Martin Owino Oduka
2nd Defendant
Joseph Omulo Opil
3rd Defendant
Philip Omolo Aida
4th Defendant
Omondi Okoth
5th Defendant
Tom Juma Kenye
6th Defendant
Martin Juma Nam
7th Defendant
Ruling
1. This ruling is in respect of the Notice of Motion application dated 2nd December, 2024. The application seeks for orders that:-a.The honourable court be pleased to grant leave to the Applicants to file the application out of time.b.The court be pleased to grant leave to the Applicant to appeal the judgement of the court delivered on September, 19th 2024 and to file Notice of Appeal and Memorandum of Appeal out of time.c.That court be pleased to stay execution or giving effect of the decision of Hon. Lady Justice Asati Esther delivered herein on September, 19th 2024 pending hearing and determination of the intended appeal.d.The costs of the application be provided for.
2. The application was supported by the averments in the Supporting Affidavit sworn by Martin Owino Oduka on 2nd December, 2024 and the annextures thereto.
3. The application was opposed vide the Respondent’s Grounds of Opposition dated 10th December, 2024.
4. It was submitted on behalf of the Applicants that leave to appeal was not sought at the appropriate time due to ill health of the instructing client. That time for lodging the Notice of Appeal had elapsed.
5. That the Applicants are on the verge of being evicted from the land where they have always lived. That they will suffer loss that cannot be compensated by damages. That the Applicants have arguable appeal. That the delay was caused by the ill health of the Applicant. That only one Applicant was responsible for the matter. That the form of the application should not bar the court from granting the orders sought.
6. On behalf of the Plaintiff/Respondent, it was submitted that an appeal lies as of right and that Defendants did not need any leave to appeal. That there is no explanation why Notice of Appeal was not ledged within 14 days from the date of the judgement. That the court will have power to grant the 2nd limb of prayer 4 but there is no explanation why Notice of Appeal was not filed within time.
7. That if stay is to be granted, then costs of the suit once taxed be deposited in court as a pre-condition and that court may also give other conditions. That there is no reason given why the other Defendants could not act and give instructions if one of them was sick.
8. I have considered the application, grounds of opposition and submissions.
9. The Applicants have explained the delay in filing the Notice of Appeal by annexing to the application medical documents to show that the lead Applicant or instructing client for counsel for the Applicants was indisposed. For the interest of justice and to allow the Applicant’s exercise their right to appeal, the application is hereby allowed as follows;a.Leave is granted to the Applicant to lodge Notice of Appeal.b.The Notice of Appeal be filed within 14 days hereof.c.Execution of the judgement of this court dated 19th September, 2024 is hereby stayed pending hearing of the intended appeal to the Court of Appeal on condition that the Applicants deposit within 45 days hereof in an interest earning account in the join names of Counsel for the parties herein the sum of Kshs.500,000/- (Kenya shillings five hundred thousand only) as security, failing which the order of stay of execution herein granted shall lapse.d.Costs of the Application to the Plaintiff/Respondent.Orders accordingly.
RULING, DATED AND SIGNED AT KISUMU, READ VIRTUALLY THIS 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS ONLINE APPLICATION.E. ASATI,JUDGE.In the presence of:Maureen- Court Assistant.Odongo for Defendants/Applicants.Orengo for Plaintiff/Respondent.