[2025] KEHC 5373 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 5373 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had only satisfied the requirement of filing the application without unreasonable delay, but failed to substantiate the claim of substantial loss and did not offer security for due performance. However, the court exercised its discretion to grant a stay of execution, noting that the appeal was arguable and that denying stay could render the appeal nugatory. The court emphasized the need to balance the right of appeal with the respondent's right to enjoy the fruits of judgment, ultimately granting the stay to preserve the subject matter pending determination of the appeal, subject to the applicant filing and serving the record of appeal within 30 days.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 5373 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: John Onyango Awuor; Respondent: Esther Wanja Miano
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kiambu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Judgment Date
27 March 2025
Case Number
Civil Appeal E009 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed.
Judges
DO Chepkwony
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Appeal Procedure, Security for Due Performance
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Onyango Awuor

Appellant

Esther Wanja Miano

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal under Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant will suffer substantial loss if stay is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether the application for stay was made without unreasonable delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had only satisfied the requirement of filing the application without unreasonable delay, but failed to substantiate the claim of substantial loss and did not offer security for due performance. However, the court exercised its discretion to grant a stay of execution, noting that the appeal was arguable and that denying stay could render the appeal nugatory. The court emphasized the need to balance the right of appeal with the respondent's right to enjoy the fruits of judgment, ultimately granting the stay to preserve the subject matter pending determination of the appeal, subject to the applicant filing and serving the record of appeal within 30 days.

Court Disposition

Application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed.

Orders

  • There be a stay of execution of the judgment and orders of Hon. L. L Gicheha, CM in Kikuyu CMC Case No.29 of 2017 pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
  • The applicant/appellant to file and serve a record of appeal within thirty (30) days from the date of this ruling.