[2022] KEHC 14073 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 14073 (KLR)

The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional and that courts have discretion to resentence convicts. The petitioner had already served over 18 years in prison, demonstrated remorse, rehabilitation, and positive...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 14073 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Joseph Onyango Awuor; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition E003 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Outcome
petition allowed; resentencing granted; immediate release ordered
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Resentencing, Robbery With Violence, Mandatory Sentencing, Rehabilitation, Section 333 2 Criminal Procedure Code
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Resentencing Robbery With Violence Mandatory Sentencing Rehabilitation Section 333 2 Criminal Procedure Code

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Onyango Awuor

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the petitioner is entitled to resentencing following the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another v Republic (2017) eKLR.
  2. 2 Whether the period spent in remand custody should be considered in resentencing under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
  3. 3 Whether the petitioner has demonstrated sufficient rehabilitation to warrant release.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional and that courts have discretion to resentence convicts. The petitioner had already served over 18 years in prison, demonstrated remorse, rehabilitation, and positive conduct, and his co-convict had already been resentenced and released. The court also considered the period spent in remand custody as required by section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. In light of these factors, the court held that the petitioner deserved a chance to reintegrate into society and ordered his immediate release, substituting the prior sentence with a term...

Court Disposition

petition allowed; resentencing granted; immediate release ordered

Orders

  • The death sentence as commuted to life imprisonment is set aside and vacated.
  • The petitioner is resentenced to the prison term already served, taking into account the period spent in remand custody.