[2017] KEPPDT 17 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that while irregularities in the nomination process were undisputed, the Complainant failed to substantiate his claim that results from five polling stations were not submitted. The testimony of the Complainant's own witness, a Presiding Officer, was found unreliable as he admitted to possessing a...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEPPDT 17 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Prof. Ayiecho Olweny; Respondent: James Onyango K’Oyoo; Respondent: Orange Democratic Party of Kenya
- Court
- Political Parties Disputes Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Complaint 115 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Complaint / Judgment
- Outcome
- complaint dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Party Nominations, Internal Dispute Resolution, Nomination Certificate, Election Irregularities
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Prof. Ayiecho Olweny
Applicant
James Onyango K’Oyoo
Respondent
Orange Democratic Party of Kenya
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Complaint / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Complainant should be awarded the nomination certificate for Member of the National Assembly, Muhoroni Constituency.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that while irregularities in the nomination process were undisputed, the Complainant failed to substantiate his claim that results from five polling stations were not submitted. The testimony of the Complainant's own witness, a Presiding Officer, was found unreliable as he admitted to possessing a ballot box and being involved in the alleged irregularities. The party's IDRM had already considered the allegations and found no material evidence to overturn the Returning Officer's results. The Tribunal held that it would not interfere with the IDRM's decision in the absence of compelling evidence and noted the contradiction in the Complainant seeking to benefit from the...
Court Disposition
complaint dismissed
Orders
- The complaint is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE POLITICAL PARTIES DISPUTES TRIBUNAL
COMPLAINT NO. 115 OF 2017
PROF. AYIECHO OLWENY ………………………………COMPLAINANT
-VERSUS-
JAMES ONYANGO K’OYOO………………………..….1ST RESPONDENT
ORANGE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF KENYA ………2ND RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
Summary of the Complaint
[1] The 2nd Respondent conducted a party nomination exercise for the position of Member of the National Assembly, Muhoroni Constituency on 25th April 2017 where the 1st Respondent was declared the winner. Aggrieved by the outcome, the Complainant lodged an appeal with the Orange Democratic Party (ODM) National Appeals Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as IDRM). At the time of filing his complaint on 6th May 2017, the party’s IDRM was yet to render a decision. Apprehensive that the 2nd Respondent would issue its nomination certificate to the 1st Respondent, the Complainant approached this Tribunal seeking redress.
[2] The Complainant avers before this Tribunal that the Returning Officer declared the final results in absence of the final tallies from the five wards in Muhoroni Constituency from which the respective Presiding Officers did not submit their results and therefore it remains unclear what the final results announced by the Returning Officer were based on.
[3] The 1st Respondent in his replying affidavit dated 8th May 2017 avers that indeed the Complainant filed an appeal before the party’s IDRM which dismissed the matter and directed the party to issue a certificate of nomination to the 1st Respondent. The 2nd Respondent admitted that there was a delay in rendering the IDRM decision which was unintentional and due to the heavy traffic of disputes to be determined.
Issues for Determination
[4] The sole issue for determination is whether or not the Complainant should be awarded the nomination certificate.
Analysis
[5] That there were irregularities during the nomination process is undisputed. However, the Complainant’s allegations that the results of the five polling stations have not been submitted for tallying to the Returning Officer remain unsubstantiated. Further, one Presiding Officer who offered testimony on behalf of the Complainant before the party’s IDRM, claimed that he was still in possession of one of the ballot boxes. This officer who testified on the Complainant’s behalf, according to his very own testimony, perpetrated the irregularities that the Complainant alleges. This was also noted by the party’s IDRM which recommended an investigation of the officer by the National Elections Board. Like the party’s IDRM, this Tribunal attached little credence to the Complainant’s testimony.
[6] It is clear that the party’s IDRM considered all the allegations in their deliberations and determined that there was no material evidence to warrant an upset of the results as announced by the Returning Officer. Moreover, it is contradictory that the Complainant would on one hand plead irregularities and yet seek to benefit from the same by seeking the declaration in his favour. This Tribunal is therefore reluctant to interfere with the IDRM decision.
Orders
The Complainant has not persuaded this Tribunal that he is deserving of the claims sought in his statement of claim filed on 6th May 2017.
The same is dismissed with no order as to costs.
DATED and DELIVERED AT NAIROBI this 9TH DAY of MAY 2017
1. Milly O. Lwanga (Presiding Member) ……………………………..
2. Paul Ngotho (Member)……………………………………………..
3. Dr. Adelaide Mbithi (Member) ………………………….…………..
4. Desma Nungo (Member) ….…………………………………………..