[2023] KEELRC 3052 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 3052 (KLR)

The court declined to grant the application for reconstruction of the court file because there was no evidence of service of the application upon the respondent's counsel, and the status of the original file was unclear. The judge noted that the file may have been closed and archived, and directed the parties to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 3052 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Benson Odero Ayieya; Respondent: National Bank of Kenya Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Cause E202 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling on Application for Reconstruction of Court File
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
Nzioki wa Makau
Legal Topics
Reconstruction of Court File, Missing Court Records, Decretal Sum Payment Status
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Reconstruction of Court File Missing Court Records Decretal Sum Payment Status

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benson Odero Ayieya

Applicant

National Bank of Kenya Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling on Application for Reconstruction of Court File

  1. 1 Whether the court file in Cause 964 of 2011 should be reconstructed due to its loss or misplacement.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient grounds for the reconstruction of the file.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent was properly served with the application for reconstruction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to grant the application for reconstruction of the court file because there was no evidence of service of the application upon the respondent's counsel, and the status of the original file was unclear. The judge noted that the file may have been closed and archived, and directed the parties to check the archives and registers to confirm the file's location before making another attempt at reconstruction. The respondent must be involved in any future application. The application was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • Application for reconstruction of court file dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.