[2025] KECPT 203 (KLR)

[2025] KECPT 203 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the claimant had established his entitlement to a refund of the share deposit balance of Kshs 308,823, as the respondent had not contested the claim and default judgment had already been entered. However, the claim for dividends failed due to lack of evidence, specifically the absence of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECPT 203 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Desderius Kiana Ayoti; Respondent: The Nairobi Women’s Hospital Sacco
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 77. E136 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment After Default and Formal Proof
Outcome
Claim for refund of share deposit allowed; claim for dividends dismissed.
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki
Legal Topics
Sacco Member Refunds, Default Judgment, Dividends Claims, Share Deposit Recovery
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Sacco Member Refunds Default Judgment Dividends Claims Share Deposit Recovery

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Desderius Kiana Ayoti

Applicant

The Nairobi Women’s Hospital Sacco

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Judgment After Default and Formal Proof

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to refund of share deposit from the respondent Sacco.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to payment of dividends for the year 2021.
  3. 3 Whether interest and costs are payable to the claimant.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the claimant had established his entitlement to a refund of the share deposit balance of Kshs 308,823, as the respondent had not contested the claim and default judgment had already been entered. However, the claim for dividends failed due to lack of evidence, specifically the absence of audited accounts to substantiate the amount claimed. The Tribunal held that only amounts supported by proper documentation could be awarded, and the claimant's assertion that the respondent refused to provide audited accounts was insufficient. Interest and costs were awarded on the principal sum from the date of filing, in line with Tribunal rates.

Court Disposition

Claim for refund of share deposit allowed; claim for dividends dismissed.

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs 308,823 as refund of share deposit.
  • The respondent shall pay interest at Tribunal rates from the date of filing claim until payment in full.