[2016] KEHC 1270 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 1270 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff had pleaded and proved the loss of stock destroyed during eviction, as evidenced by an uncontroverted inventory. The omission of the sum of Kshs. 2,877,715 from the original judgment was an error, and the court was persuaded that this amount should have been included. By consent of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 1270 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Azim Sameja Trading as Business 2000; Defendant: Lakhasmshi Virpal Shah; Defendant: Kamlaben Lakhamshi Shah; Defendant: Ashokhurmar Lamkhamshi Shah; Defendant: Ashokhurmar Lamkhamishi Shah; Defendant: Harsha Lakhamshi Shah; Defendant: Pritmalakha Shah Trading as High Park Investments
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 689 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Review of Judgment
Outcome
application for review allowed; judgment reviewed and amended
Judges
A Mbogholi-Msagha
Legal Topics
Review of Judgment, Damages for Loss of Goods, Eviction Liability
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Tort Law Review of Judgment Damages for Loss of Goods Eviction Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Azim Sameja Trading as Business 2000

Plaintiff

Lakhasmshi Virpal Shah

Defendant

Kamlaben Lakhamshi Shah

Defendant

Ashokhurmar Lamkhamshi Shah

Defendant

Ashokhurmar Lamkhamishi Shah

Defendant

Harsha Lakhamshi Shah

Defendant

Pritmalakha Shah Trading as High Park Investments

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Review of Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the judgment should be reviewed to include the sum for stock destroyed during eviction.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff proved loss of business assets as pleaded.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had pleaded and proved the loss of stock destroyed during eviction, as evidenced by an uncontroverted inventory. The omission of the sum of Kshs. 2,877,715 from the original judgment was an error, and the court was persuaded that this amount should have been included. By consent of both parties, and upon review of the judgment and evidence, the court amended the judgment to add the sum for destroyed stock to the previously awarded amount, resulting in a new total of Kshs. 4,552,306. No order as to costs was made.

Court Disposition

application for review allowed; judgment reviewed and amended

Orders

  • The judgment is reviewed and amended to include Kshs. 2,877,715 for destroyed stock, making a total award of Kshs. 4,552,306 to the plaintiff.
  • No order as to costs.